|
This is a general surgical medical history gathered from various sources, knowing history can help the present and future achievements
Through his toiling and living, man has ever taken advantage of all
things available in his environment, subsequently transmitting his experiences
to his descendants. Popular culture, which is outcome of multi-millenary flow of
such experiences, embodies all those things, that have been achieved in the
arena of existence along the contacts of man with his surrounding.
Among the fabrics of popular culture, medical science, for reason of
need, has always occupied an important estimable position. Curing mental disorders by means of specific rituals, musical
performances, behaviors and customs in based on a precise knowledge of man's
psyche and factors affecting it was in order. Turkmen "Por Khan", "Baba & Mama Zar" on Southern shores (Gulf), tattooing in order
to heal articular pains, which undoubtedly shares common origins with
acupuncture and utilization of medicinal herbal concoctions, are but example of
a science rooted in popular culture. In some areas of Iran, including Kurdistan and Azerbaijan, long before,
introduction of vaccination the people knew how to prevent small-pox epidemics
by traditional means. Likewise today people knew merits of mineral warm springs and indeed
utilized those in medical treatment. Traditional bone-binders adroitly reassemble pieces of broken jug inside
a closed bag, considering this feat a more manipulator practice. Treating sick children, healing wounds, blood-letting, cupping and the
like constitute a trade, which beyond its practical uses, acquires rational
expressivities, illustrating well-known
saying:
In order to understand the milieu in which Islamic
medicine was born, one has to understand the salient events in the advent of
Islam and a few events just preceding the Islamic era. Arabia which was a large
area covered mostly by an arid desert that was roamed by nomadic tribes of
Bedouins. Certain communities had been established where the trade routes
intersected and water was available. Mecca was along the Yaman- Damascus trade
route. It was considered a holy city and a sanctuary. The Kaaba or house of
worship was replete with idols of different gods each representing a tribe or
community. These Bedouins had their own tribal moral or ethical codes of conduct
and idolatry was in practice. Blood feuds were common and attacking caravans
along trade routes was a way of life. Sacrifices were often offered to appease
the gods and burying of live female children was common practice. Family feuds
were common and settling scores in order to uphold tribal honor led to frequent
bloody encounters in which many people were killed. Women and children were
treated as ‘chattels’ or private possessions and became the property of the
winner. This era of Arabia is frequently referred by Muslims as
‘Jahilliya’ or age of ignorance. Islam was not only to bring dramatic
changes in the religious practices of these warring nomadic tribes but also
unite them into an unprecedented social and cultural nation that very quickly
was to develop into a strong political entity, with its own system of
administration, justice, and military power, all under one leadership. The first
leader of the Islamic State was no doubt the Prophet of Islam, Mohammed but then
his four successors called the ‘Pious Caliphs’ were to quickly
consolidated and expand the nation. Within one hundred years of coming into
existence, the Islamic empire had spread from Spain in the west, to China in the
east, and encompassed in its midst, the whole of northern Africa ,Egypt, Syria,
Palestine, Transjordan ,Central Asia and parts of western India. Later it was to
be even carried further by the Muslim merchants to the shores of the far east
including the Malaysian peninsula, the islands of the East Indies and Indonesia.
In its early era and for several centuries, the Islamic empire was centrally
governed by a leader or ‘Caliph’ and administered by provincial governors. The
first four Caliphs were elected democratically but the later the Caliphate
became dynastic. Later still a western Caliphate was established in Spain. In
later history the Islamic Nation was to break up into various kingdoms, as the
provincial rulers become more autonomous and independent of the center and was
ultimately to be overrun by the Sejluk Turks who were the forerunners of the
Ottoman empire. The early era of Islamic Medicine and the
School of medicine at Jundishapur: Jundishapur or ‘Gondeshapur’ was a city in
Khuzistan founded by a Sasnid emperor Shapur I (241-272 AD) before the advent of
ISLAM.It was to settle Greek prisoners, hence the name ‘Wandew Shapur’ or
‘acquired by Shapur.’ In present day western Persia the site is marked by the
ruins of Shahbad near the city of Ahwaz. The town was taken by Muslims during
the caliphate of Hadrat Umar, by Abu Musa Al-Ashari in (17 AH/738 AD ). At this
time it already had a well established Hospital and Medical
school. Many Syrians took refuge in the city when
Antioch was captured by Shapur I. In fact the latter nicknamed the city
‘Vehaz-Andevi Shapur’ or ‘Shapur is better than Antioch.’ The closing of the
Nestorian School of Edessa by Emperor Zeno in 489 AD led to the Nestorians
fleeing from there and seeking refuge in Jundishapur under patronage of Shapur
II, which got an academic boost as a result. The Greek influence was already
predominant in Jundishapur when the closing of the Athenian school in 529 AD by
order of the Byzantine emperor Justinian drove many learned Greek physicians to
this town. A University with a medical school and a hospital were established by
Khusraw Anushirwan the wise (531-579 AD) where the Greeco-Syriac medicine
blossomed. To this was added medical knowledge from India brought by the
physician vizier of Anushirwan called ‘Burzuyah.’ On his return the latter
brought back from India the famous ‘Fables of Bidpai’, several Indian
Physicians, details of Indian Medical Texts and a Pahlavi translation of the
‘Kalila and Dimma.’ Khusraw was even presented a translation of Aristotleian
Logic and philosophy. Thus at the time of the Islamic invasion the school of
Jundishapur was well established and had become renowned as a medical center of
Greek, Syriac and Indian learning. This knowledge had intermingled to create a
highly acclaimed and state of the art Medical school and hospital. After the
advent of Islamic rule the University continued to thrive. In fact the first
recorded Muslim Physician Harith bin Kalada, who was a contemporary of the
Prophet acquired his medical knowledge at medical school and hospital at
Jundishapur. It is likely that the medical teaching at
Jundishapur was modeled after the teaching at Alexandria with some influence
from Antioch but it is important to note that ‘the treatment was based
entirely on scientific analysis, in true Hippocratic tradition’, rather than
a mix-up with superstition and rituals as was the case in Greek
‘asclepieia’ and Byzantine ‘nosocomia’. This hospital and Medical
Center was to become the model on which all later Islamic Medical Scools and
Hospitals were to be built .The School none the less thrived during the Ummayid
caliphate and Sergius of Rasul‘ayn translated medical and philosophical
works of both Hippocrates and Galen into Syriac.These were later to be
translated into Arabic casting an everlasting imprint onto all the future of
Islamic Medicine. It was during the Abbasid Caliphate that Caliph
al-Mansur the founder of the city of Baghdad invited the then head of the
Jundishapur School to treat him. This physician was Jirjis Bukhtyishu, a
Christian whose name meant ‘Jesus has saved’. He treated the Caliph successfully
and got appointed to the court. He however did not stay permanently in Baghdad
returning to Jundishapur before his death, but the migration to Baghdad had
begun. Thus his son Jibrail Bukhtishu established practice in the city and
became a prominent physician. Another family that migrated from Jundishapur to
Baghdad was the family of Masawayh who went at the invitation of Caliph
Harun-ul-Rashid and became a famous Ophthalmologist. Most famous amongst his
three sons who were physicians was Yuhanna ibn Masawayh (Mesue Senior). He wrote
prolifically and 42 works are attributed to him. By this time second half of 2nd
century after hijra (8th century AD) the fame of Baghdad began to rise as also
the political power of the caliphate. Many hospitals and medical centers were
established and tremendous intellectual activity was recorded. This culminated
into the period of Islamic Renaissance and the golden era of Islamic Medicine of
which description is given under a separate section. ‘Bait-ul-Hikma’ or House of Wisdom was founded
in 214 AH 830 AD by the Caliph Al-Mamun an Abbasid Caliph. Ibn Al Nadim,
who was the son of a bookseller and whose famous catalogue of books ‘Firhist of
Nadim’ tells us of many of the Books of his time, relates this story of the
Caliph: Aristotle appeared in the dream of the learned Caliph and told him that
there was no conflict between reason and revelation. The Caliph thus set about
searching for books and manuscripts of the ancient Greek philosophers and
scientists. He sent an emissary to the Byzantine Emperor to get all the
scientific manuscripts that were apparently stored in an old and dilapidated
building. After initially turning him down the emperor granted him his request.
Among the emissaries sent to select the works was the first director of the
house of wisdom Salman, who was the one that led the delegation .Others in it
were al Hajjaj Ibn Matar, Ibn al Batrik.They brought back with them many Greek
scientific works and manuscripts. Translations of all of these was immediately
started.However the translation of the medical works of the Greeks had started
earlier during the reign of Caliph Harun al Rashid, with the building of the
first hospital under the Caliph’s patronage. Ibn Nadim lists 57 Translators associated with
he House of Wisdom. The one’s who formed the first delegation to the Byzantine
King have already been named. Other famous ones are as
follows: 1. al Hajjaj ibn Yusuf ibn Matar completed
translation of Euclid’s elements. Other Greek authors including Aristotle,
Archimedes, Pythogras, Theodesius, Jerash, Apollonius, Theon and Menelaus all
were translated. 2. Muhammad ibn Mujsa al-Khwarizimi born in
Khiva systematically explored arithmetic and al-gebra. The latter derived its
name from his discourse: ‘Kitab al-Jabr wa al-Muqabla.’ Algebra was derived from
the second letter and meant ‘bone setting’ a graphic description of operations
on solving quadrantic equations. 3. The knowledge of geometry flourished and
with it architecture and design. Ibn Khaldun was later to describe geometry as a
science that ‘enlightens the intelligence of man and cultivates rational
thinking.’ 4. Mamun’s court astronomer was Musa ibn
Shakir. His three sons Muhammad, Ahmad and al-Hassan devoted their lives to the
search of knowledge. They exemplified the Prophetic traditions and dicta: ‘Seek
learning even if it be in China.’ ‘The search for knowledge is obligatory on
every Muslim.’ ‘The ink of scholars is worth more than the blood of
martyrs.’ 5. The works of these learned men or ‘Sons of
Musa" were exceptionally creative. They wrote on: celestial mechanics, the atom,
the origins of earth, Ptolemic universe, the properties of the ellipse, Planes
and spheres, The knowledge of geometry served in practice to create canals,
bridges and architectural designs. 6. Muhammad ibn Musa on one of his travels met
Thabit ibn Qurra. The latter was master in three languages. Greek, Syraic and
Arabic and soon got appointed to become the court astrologer to Caliph
al-Mutadid. He was invaluable addition to the House of Wisdom. In 70 original
works he wrote on every conceivable subject including mathematics, astronomy
astrology, ethics, mechanics, physics, philosophy, and published commentaries on
Euclid, Ptolemy, and other Greek thinkers and
philosophers. 7. The two sons of Thabit ibn Qurra also became
famous. Sinan was a famous physician in Baghdad. He was director of several
hospitals and was court physician to three successive caliphs. His son Ibrahim
also became a prominent scientist. He invented sundials and wrote a special
treatise on this subject on this subject. 8. The greatest medical mind in the House of
Wisdom was Hunain ibn Ishaq. Born in Hira Hunain was the son of an apothecary.
He soon translated entire collection of Greek medical works including Galen,
Hippocrates. Hunain was an extremely gifted and talented translator. From being
just a literal translator he tended to be more scientific and duly interpreted
the original text by cross reference, annotation and citing glossaries. His
original contributions included 10 works on ophthalmology which were extremely
systematic. He rose to the highest honor by being appointed the director of the
House of Wisdom by Caliph al Mutawakkil. 9. Qusta ibn Luqa was another accomplished
translator and scholar. He has 40 original contributions to his credit. He wrote
on diverse subjects such as ‘mirrors, hairs, fans, winds, logic, geometry and
astronomy to name a few. 10. Yuhanna ibn Masawaih (Mesuse senior) was an
early director of the House of Wisdom. He served under four caliphs. Al Mamun,
al-Mutassim, al-Wathik and al-Mutawakkil. He wrote about medical especially
gynecological problems. 11. The effect of the House of wisdom was
tremendous. Islamic Science, philosophy, art and architecture all felt its
effects. Agriculture, Government, prosperity and economic wealth were the
benefactors. It ultimately was responsible to produce figures like Al-Kindi,
Al-Farabi, some of the greatest thinkers, scientists and philosophers of Islam.
Also some of the greatest Islamic Physicians had available to them all the
knowledge of ancient Greece, Syria, India and Persia available to them and in
turn they contributed by their astute observation and originality. The giants of
Islamic Medicine and their achievements are described
elsewhere. Hospitals during the Islamic
era: The idea of a hospital as an institutional
place for the caring of the sick has not been recorded in antiqiuty. There were
sanatoria and ‘travel lodges’ that were attached to temples where the sick were
attended to by attendant priests. Most of the therapy in these sanatoria
consisted of prayers and sacrifices to the gods of healing especially to
Aaescalapius. Cures that ocured were thought to result from divine
interventions. A large number of hospitals were developed
early during the Islamic era.They were to be called ‘Bimaristan’ or
‘Maristan’. The idea of a hospital as a place where sick could get attention
was totally adopted by the early Caliphs. The first hospital is creditied to
Caliph Al-Walid I an Ummayad Caliph (86-96 AH 705-715 AD), by some it was
however considered no more than a leprosoria because it allowed the seggregation
of lepers from others. It did have on staff ‘salaried doctors’ to attend the
sick. The first true Islamic hospital was built
during the reign of Caliph Harun-ul-Rashid (170-193 AH 786-809 AD). Having heard
of the famous medical institution at Jundishapur already described above the
Caliph invited the son of the chief physician, Jibrail Bakhtishu to come to
Baghdad and head the new ‘bimaristan’ which he did.It rapidly achieved fame and
led quickly to developments of other hospitals in Baghdad. One of these the
‘Audidi’ hospital was to be built under the instructions of the great Islamic
Physician Al-Razi. It is said that in order to select the best site for the
hospital he had pieces of meat hung in various quartters of the city and watched
their putrefaction and advised the Caliph to site the hospital where the
putrefaction was the slowest and the least ! At its inception it had 24
physicians on staff including specialists categorized as Physiologists,
oculists, surgeons and bonesetters. When Djubair visitied Baghdad in 580 AH/
1184 AD he recorded that this hospital was ‘like a great castle’ with water
supply from the tigris and all appurtenances of Royal
Palaces. One of the largest hospitals ever built was the
Mansuri Hospital in Cairo it was completed in 1248 by the orders of the Mameluke
ruler of Egypt, Mansur Qalaun. It was most elaborate. It had a total capacity of
8000 people ! The annual income from endowments alone was One million dirhams.
Men and women were admitted to separate wards. Irrespective of race religion and
creed or citizenship (as specifically stated in the Waqf documents) nobody was
ever turned away .There was no limit to the time the patient was treated as an
inpatient ! ( what a contrast from present HMO’s !) . There were separate wards
for men and women and medicine, surgery, fevers and eye diseases had separate
wards. It had its own pharmacy, library and lecture halls. It had a mosque for
Muslim patients as well a chapel for Christian patients ! The Waqf document specifically stated: ‘The
hospital shall keep all patients, men and women until they are completely
recovered. All costs are to be borne by the hospital whether the people come
from afar or near, whether they are residents or foreigners, strong or weak, low
or high, rich or poor, employed or unemployed, blind or sigted, physically or
mentally ill, learned or illiterate. There are no conditions of consideration
and payment; none is objected to or even indirectly hinted at for non-payment.
The entire service is through the magnificence of Allah, the generous
one.’ As to the physical conditions of these
hospitals especially those established by princes, rulers and viziers it can be
stated that some of these were luxurious and were actual palaces that had been
converted to hospitals. Even contemporary Europe could not boast of a single
hospital that came close to the facilities that were provided in these
intitutions. Some of them especially in Baghdad, Egypt and Syria had furnishings
were similar to those in the palaces.Most of theser being under the patronage of
the viziers, sultans and caliphs were no doubt inspired by the Islamic teaching
of the welfare of the poor and needy. The Quran tells us: ‘You shall not
attend to virtue unless you spend for the welfare of the poor from the choicest
part of your wealth’ (3,92) and again: ‘O you who believe spend (for the
poor) from the worthiest part of what you have earned and what your crop yields,
and do not give away from its unworthy parts- such that you yourselves will not
take until you examine the quality minutely- and know that Allah is not in your
need and all praise belongs to Him.’ (2,267). As to the salaries of Physicians here is some
information from authentic sources. The annual income of Jibrail ibn Bakitshu
who was the Chief of Staff at a Baghdad hospital during the reign of Mamun
ArRashid (d c.e 833/218 A.H.) as recorded by his own secretary was 4.9 million
dirhams. His son also a doctor lived in a house in Baghdad that was
air-conditioned by ice in summer and heated by charcoal in winter ! A resident
by comparison who was supposed to be on duty for two days and two nights a week,
was paid 300 dirhams a month. (Remind you of Denton Cooley and his fellows
?). The great physicians of Islamic Medicine:
The era of Islamic Medicine produced some very
famous and notable physicians.These physicians were not only responsible to get
all the existing information on Medicine of the time together but add to this
knowledge by their own astute observations, experimentation and skills. Many of
them were skilled in medical writing and produced encyclopedic works which
became standard texts and reference works for centuries. With the coming of
European Rennaicanse they formed the basis on which the european authors gained
insight into the medicine of the ‘ancients’ or early greek authors whose works
weree only preserved in Arabic. In addition many re-discoveries took place which
had already been recorded by the Islamic physicians but hitherto had been
unknown until recently uncovered. The classical example of the discovery of
Pulmonary circulation originally given to Servetus was found to have been
succintly describned by Ibn Nafis an Islamic Physician who lived centuries
earlier. Ibn Nafis repudiated the earlier concepts held by Galen and described
the lesser circulation so succinctly that nothing more could be added until
Malphigi could describe the alveoli and the pulmonary cappillaries with the
asdvent of the microscope discovered by Anthony Von Luwenheek in mid 19th
Century.Some of them form the basis of instruction of students of Tibb and Hikma
the traditional Islamic Medicine practiced in the subcontinent of India and
Pakistan, even today under the banner of Tibb or Unani Meidicne.! It would be
out of scope for us in this chapter to describe the accomplishments of each of
these physicians, however we will proceed with giving you the salient
accomplishments of some of the most notable amongst them. For sake of
classsifiction the historic periods of the Islamic Physicians can be divided
into three parts: 1. The period of Islamic Rennaisance: From the beginning of
Islam to the end of the Abbasid dynasty. 2. The period of Islamic Epoch: When
all sciences including Medicine reached the pinnacle of development under the
Islamic patronage. 3. The period of decline: during which the knowlege of
Islamic Medicine was translated into european languages and became the basis of
further development and discoveries and ultimately led to basis for the
development of Modern Medicine. The notable physicians during this period were
as follows: Bukhtishu family of Physicians. The oldest
amongst these was Jibrail Bukhtishu who was the Chief Physician at the Hospital
in Jundishapur. He came from a Christain family and was summoned to the court of
Caliph Mamun (148AH/765 AD) when the latter fell ill. After having treated him
successfully he was invited to stay in Baghdad and head a hospital there but he
declined and returned to his native Jundishapur.(152 AH/769 AD) It was his son
Jurjis Bukhtishu who was later invited by Caliph Harun-ul-Rashid to come to
Baghdad to treat him (171AH/787 AD) and then offered to be the Chief Physician
and head a hospital in Baghdad which he did till he died in 185 AH/801 AD).
Masawaih is another family of physicians
associated with early Islamic History.During the reign of Caliph Harun-ul-Rashid
the elder of the family migratd from Jundishapur t Baghdad and become a
celebrated Ophthalmologist. He wrote the first Arabic treatise on ophthalmology.
His son known to the west as Mesue Senior with real name of Yuhanna ibn Masawayh
wrote several medical works in Arabic while translating other works from
Greek.He is known for somewhat of a sarcastic temperament none the less
commanded great repect becuase of his medical expertise. Hunayn ibn Ishaq who was a student of ibn
Masawayh became the greatest translator of Greek and Syriac medical texts during
the 3rd century AH/9th century AD. He was responsible for masterly translations
of Galen,Hippocrates, Aristotle into Arabic. He also improved the Arabic Medical
lexicon giving it a rich technical medical language to express medical
terninology and thus laid the foundations of the rich medical expression in
Arabic language far superceeding the later translations from Arabic to Latin.He
was himself an astute physician and wrote two original works on
ophthalmology. The credit of the first sytematic work on medicine during this era goes to a muslim physician Ali ibn Rabban al-Tabbari hailing from Persia but settling in Baghdad in the first half of the 3rd century AH/9th century AD. His work called ‘Firdaws a--Hikma’ or ‘Paradise of Wisdom’ contained extensive information from all extant sources including Greek, Syriac,Persian and Indian and contained an extensive treatment of Anatomy .
Claudius Galen was a Greek physician who went to Rome and revived the ideas of Hippocrates and other Greek doctors. The Romans had shown little interest in the work of Hippocrates and it took Galen to push it forward in Rome.
Galen was born in 131 AD. He was a gifted intellect who studied at the famous medical school in Alexandria in Egypt. At the age of 28, Galen became the surgeon to a school of gladiators but in 161 AD he moved to Rome apparently with the sole intention of seeking fame and fortune. He certainly achieved his fame but for some Romans this became too much. As a Greek, many Romans viewed Galen with suspicion and in 166 AD, he was forced to flee the city. Two years later he went back to the city in response to an invitation by the emperor. With this protection, Galen remained in the city until his death, aged about 70, in 201 AD. Galen revived the methods favoured by Hippocrates and other Greek doctors who lived at the time of Hippocrates. He put great emphasis on clinical observation – examining a patient very thoroughly and noting their symptoms. Galen also accepted the view that disease was the result of an imbalance between blood, phlegm, yellow bile and blood bile. Galen also believed in the healing power of nature and he developed treatments to restore the balance of the four humours. Galen believed in the use of opposites – if a man appeared to have a fever, he treated it with something cold; if a man appeared to have a cold, he would be treated with heat. People who were weak were given hard physical exercises to do to build up their muscles. People who had breathing problems due to a weak chest were given singing exercises. Galen extended his knowledge of anatomy by dissecting pigs and apes and studying their bone structure and muscles. Galen was also interested in human anatomy but there is no evidence that he dissected human bodies – though rumours persisted that he did. In "On Anatomical Procedures", Galen advised his students to dissect apes but take whatever opportunities that existed to study the human body. Galen also studied how the body worked, concentrating on the movement of blood and the working of the nervous system. For the latter, he experimented with the spinal cords of pigs.
Galen’s influence was great. Protected by the emperors, he could work free from his jealous rivals in Rome. Galen also believed that his knowledge should be shared and he was a prodigious writer of books. These books were still being used in the Middle Ages and, for many medical students, they were the primary source of information on medicine Robert Koch was born in 1843. Koch worked on anthrax and tuberculosis (TB) and he further developed the work of Louis Pasteur. Koch’s fame, alongside that of Alexander Fleming, Edward Jenner, Joseph Lister and Pasteur himself, is firmly cemented in medical history.
Koch came from a poor mining family and it took him a lot of determination to get a university place where he first studied mathematics and natural science and then studied medicine. Pasteur was convinced that microbes caused diseases in humans but his work on cholera had failed. He was never able to directly link one microbe with a disease. Koch succeeded in doing this. Koch was a doctor and he had a detailed knowledge of the human body – something that Pasteur, as a research scientist – lacked. He was also skilled in experiments, the result of his work in natural sciences. Qualities that also proved to be important were his ability to work for long periods of time and his patience. However, Koch was also difficult to work with and could not tolerate anyone telling him that his theories were wrong. In 1872, Koch became district medical officer for a rural area near Berlin. He started to experiment with microbes in a small laboratory he had built for himself in his surgery. The first disease that Koch investigated was anthrax. This was a disease that could seriously affect herds of farm animals and farmers were rightly in fear of it. Other scientists had also been working on anthrax. In 1868, a French scientist called Davaine had proved that a healthy animal that did not have anthrax could get the disease if it was injected with blood containing anthrax. Koch developed this work further and for three years he spent all his spare time finding out what he could about the disease, including its life cycle. Koch found out that the anthrax microbe produced spores that lived for a long time after an animal had died. He also proved that these spores could then develop into the anthrax germ and could infect other animals. After this, Koch moved onto germs that specifically affected humans. In 1878, he identified the germ that caused blood poisoning and septicaemia. He also developed new techniques for conducting experiments that influenced the way many other scientists carried out their experiments. He knew that infected blood contained the septicaemia germ but he could not see these germs under a microscope, and therefore, other scientists were unlikely to believe what he thought to be true without the evidence. Koch discovered that methyl violet dye showed up the septicaemia germ under a microscope by staining it. He also photographed the germs so that people outside of his laboratory could see them. Koch also devised a method of proving which germ caused an infection. His work was rewarded in 1880 when he was appointed to a post at the Imperial Health Office in Berlin. Here, Koch perfected the technique of growing pure cultures of germs using a mix of potatoes and gelatine. This was a solid enough substance to allow for the germs to be studied better. Koch gathered round him a team of researchers in Berlin in 1881 and began to work on one of the worst diseases of the nineteenth century – tuberculosis (TB). The TB germ was much smaller than the anthrax germ so the search for it was difficult. Using a more specialised version of his dye technique, Koch and his team searched for the TB germ. In May 1882, Koch announced that his team had found the germ. His announcement caused great excitement. It also generated what became known as ‘microbe hunters’ – a new generation of young scientists who were inspired by the work of both Koch and Pasteur. One of those who was inspired by Koch was Paul Ehrlich. What was Koch’s legacy? He had finally laid to rest the belief that ‘bad air’ caused disease. He had inspired many other younger researchers to build on his work. He had found the germs of two feared diseases – anthrax and TB. He had developed research techniques that others could use throughout the world. By 1900, twenty-one germs that caused diseases had been identified in just 21 years. "As soon as the right method was found, discoveries came as easily as ripe apples from a tree." (Koch) It was Koch who had developed the right methods.
Leonardo da Vinci
Native American tribes are known to have had “medicine men” that excelled in
knowledge and use of the healing properties of herbs and other plants. These
healers played an important part in the cultural life and physical well-being of
their people.
Chief Red Cloud, Oglala Lakota (1822-1909) The Susutra "Textbook" of Indian Medicine used by several groups of Native Americans clearly shows that some ancient Indian physicians were obsessed with classification. For example, there were 66 diseases of the oral cavity and 6 of the ear lobe. Surgery was used and describe into divisions including incision, excision, scraping, puncturing, probing, extraction, provoking secretion, and suturing. Over 100 surgical instruments were described by various tribes. The hand was considered to be the most important instrument. In some cultures, wine and hypnotism were used as the first anesthetics. Theodor Billroth Carrel was a French surgeon who developed fine surgical techniques. He perfected the technique for sewing together blood vessels, and repairing damaged arteries. He had a life long Interest in wound healing. A pioneer in tissue culture and organ transplantation, he received the Nobel Prize in 1912. Murray received the Nobel Prize in 1990 for his pioneering work in organ transplantation. His basic research identified the immunologic barrier to organ transplantation. He performed the first successful kidney transplant between identical twins with severe kidney disease. Michael DeBakey ![]() ![]() DNA is a double-stranded molecule twisted into a helix (like a spiral
staircase). Each spiraling strand is comprised of a sugar-phosphate backbone
with attached base molecules, which are adenine, thymine, cytosine and guanine.
These molecules are connected to a complementary strand of hydrogen that bonds
with paired bases. Adenine and thymine are connected by two hydrogen bonds.
Guanine and cytosine are connected by three hydrogen bonds.
![]() During this period, medical healing went from the antibiotic age to molecular
age. Scientific discoveries were applied to bio-technological solutions of the
patient’s needs, such as sophisticated laboratory tests, computerized imaging
techniques, and mechanical innovations.
1978: Louise Brown, the first test tube baby, is born in England
1984: Chemotherapy and cancer drugs are tested and approved for patient use. 1984: Improved radioisotope procedures 1990: Better post operative therapy (patients are up in days post-op, compared to weeks) 1995: Surgeons at Duke University successfully transplant hearts from pigs into baboons, proving cross-species transplantation is possible. Great progress has been made in public awareness and education. Patients are being taught the role of lifestyle, habits and environment on their health. There has been a combined scientific and government campaign to warn the public about health risks such as smoking. Community safety standards have been established and there is vastly improved hospital and emergency care. Education has played an important role to improve the health of patients. For example, expectant mothers now receive pre-natal care, which has significantly decreased infant mortality rates. We Live in a Time of "Small Miracles"
Dr. Joseph Bruner at Vanderbilt is known for his work in fetal surgery, especially on babies with spina bifida, a condition in which the spine does not close properly during development. Vanderbilt confirms that little Samuel Armus was 21 weeks-old in the womb which makes the surgery very risky because if anything goes wrong, the baby cannot survive on its own. Dr. Bruner and his colleagues, however, have done numerous successful spina bifida surgeries on fetuses that are not yet viable. In this particular surgery, the baby's hand poked out of the incision in its mother's womb and Dr. Bruner says he instinctively offered his finger for the baby to hold. When the baby's hand popped out of the surgical opening on its own, the doctor put his finger into the baby's hand, the baby squeezed his finger and held on.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
According to "Stele of Hamurabi", on which most ancient written laws of
mankind are recorded, origin of medicine may be traced back to years, even
centuries, before second millennium B.C. 282 articles listed on Stele include
several dealing with medicine. Among these, No. 215 infers that, about 2000
years before Christ, surgical bronze instruments were currently used in
Mesopotamia, and that surgeons living 4000 years ago were able to perform
refined operations, particularly in ophthalmologic field.
Text reads thus: "If a doctor heals a wound with a bronze instrument,
removing the white stain of eye with it, he will receive 10 Silver Sokel for his
medical fee." In the face of this privilege, a strict code of medical ethics was also
implemented. Thus, could see in Article 218: "If a doctor doesn't heal a wound
and worsens the sick eye, both his hands should be severed." In ancient Iran, medicine was based on more comprehensive laws, to which
allusions are found in "Vandidad", collection of laws in "Mazd Yasna". Vandidad
is written in the form of dialog and following teachings of "Ahura Mazda"
recorded in this book. The first physician capable of healing pain, fever and untimely death, in
ancient world, was "Tariteh". Paragraphs 36 and 37 of chapter 7 (Vandidad) describe arduous process of
achieving title of physician. The book also refers to punition of an unskilled
doctor, who touches upon surgery. "Dinkert", whose text was most probably compiled from Sassanid sources,
provides further information on medical science. It lists five means of
healing: Today, Hallmark of city is mausoleum of Iran's illustrious general,
Safarid "Yaqoub Leis". In the course of time, with gradual attraction of physicians from
Jondishapour, by Caliphs, seated in Baqdad, scientific focus shifted from
Jondishapour to Baqdad. Nevertheless, thanks to Dailamite "Azedoddoleh", medical science once
again flourished in Iran. In Shiraz, city's public hospital, known as "Azodi
Hospital", was built as part of a university, where philosophy, astronomy,
medicine, chemistry and mathematics were taught. Also, existence of scientists,
such as Razi and Avicenna, as well as masters like Jorjani (compiler of
"Zechariah Kharazmshahi Medical Encyclopedia"), permitted medical science to
continue its evolution and have its Sassanid flourish again. Following that radiant era, a period of despoilment came to pass, during
which no scientific centrality existed. Later, with accession of Qazan Khan, assisted by his minister,
Rashideddin, physician of Abaqa Khan, a university town was erected in Iranian
Capital. In view of establishing its medical school (Rashidi Darosshafa), fifty
re-known physicians from India, China, Syria,... were brought together, each
being entrusted education of ten students. The enlightened minister also established another hospital in Soltanieh,
in a district named after him. The expense of this hospital were provided by
endowments. Moreover, yet another hospital, which served for many years, was
created in Citadel of Soltanieh upon the orders of Sultan Mohammad Khoda
Bandeh.
Classical Medicine
In Ancient Greece, people believed that the art of healing was originally taught taught to Aesculapius by the gods Apollo and Chiron. Aesculapius was probably a real man who lived about 1200 BC, but, as years passed, he came to be worshiped as a god. In the temples of Aesculapius, the sick were treated by priests with a combination of rest, exercise, diet, and magic. In 460 BC, Hippocrates, the most
famous of all ancient physicians, was born on the island of Cos. He and his
students wrote over 70 books that tell much about ancient Greek healthcare and
the beginning of professional medicine. The Greeks believed that physicians
should not work for personal gain but for love of mankind, and many of our
professional standards can be traced back to the Hippocratic school. Even
today, physicians still swear to the Hippocratic Oath before beginning
practice.
Greek physicians believed that
the entire person was affected as a result of an imbalance between the four
"humors"--blood, phlegm, black bile, and yellow bile--their associated
conditions--hot, cold, moist, and dry--and the four "elements"--earth, air,
fire, and water. When patients were ill, they were often bled or given potions
to induce vomiting in order to bring their four humors back into harmony.
Although this may seem strange to us today, the Greek treatment methodology is
more familiar. Physicians carefully recorded case histories and conducted
tests--usually by sight, touch, hearing, or smell--in order to provide better
diagnoses. Their simple treatments included prescriptions, careful diet, and
very minor surgery.
Romans did not value medicine as
much as the Greeks. In fact, most of the physicians who practiced in Rome came
from Greece. Still, public health was emphasized--Roman water and sewage
systems were not equaled until well into the 19th century--and surgery was very
important to the Roman Legion. Army surgeons were far more proficient than the
Greek physicians. They developed specialized instruments to remove arrows, and
they could suture wounds or blood vessels as well as treat bladder stones,
hernias, and cataracts. Hospitals were commonly found in military camps located
throughout the empire to allow soldiers to be treated far from Rome. Although
little has been discovered about Roman dentistry, there are records that show
false teeth and elaborate dental prostheses were made from gold.
The most influential physician of
the Roman era was Galen, who served the emperor Marcus Aurelius. He learned
much about trauma care while serving as the principal physician to the best
professional gladiators. Galen wrote over 500 books on medicine, many designed
to teach the medical arts to new practitioners. He stressed that the best way
to learn about health and disease was through the dissection of animals and the
study of anatomy. Although Galen discovered the functions of many internal
organs, he also made many mistakes because he assumed that the human body worked
exactly like that of other animals. His works were used as standard medical
references until the end of the Middle Ages.
Hippocrates: The "Greek Miracle" in Medicine
I. Historical Context
The Hippocratic Corpus consists of some 60 medical treatises, the majority
of them conventionally dated to the later decades of the Fifth Century B.C., or
to the early decades of the Fourth; that is to say, at the culmination of the
"Classical Period," the time when Pericles was leader of the Athenian democracy,
when Ictinus was designing the Parthenon and the Apollo temple at Bassae and
Phidias finishing his gold and ivory statues of Athene Parthenos for Ictinus'
temple and of the seated Zeus for the temple at Olympia.
To the later Plato and to Aristotle, Hippocrates from the island of Cos was
known as a famous physician, and subsequent tradition sets Hippocrates into the
midst of the intellectual ferment at the end of the Fifth Century. Aulus
Gellius, a Roman rhetorician of the Second Century A.D., puts it this way:
Then the great Peloponnesian War began in Greece, which Thucydides has
handed down to memory . . .. During that period Sophocles, and later Euripides,
were famous and renowned as tragic poets, Hippocrates as a physician, and as a
philosopher, Democritus; Socrates the Athenian was younger than these, but was
in part their contemporary. (Noctes AtticaeXVII.21, 16-18).
A variety of developments enabled Hippocratic writers to make medicine a
full participant in the so-called "Revolution of Wisdoms" of the latter Fifth
Century B.C. A favorite explanation has long been influence from Presocratic
natural philosophers, for these predecessors and contemporaries did pioneer
techniques for explaining phenomena in the natural world by means of mechanical
processes, summoning analogies that enabled them to see with the eye of the mind
what was hidden from their eyes. The sophists, too, were important, for those
teachers of knowledge and rhetoric spread over the Greek world at approximately
the same time as itinerant Hippocratic physicians. Sophists' training taught men
how to mount a convincing argument; direct participation in political assemblies
and the law courts gave citizens ample practice in distinguishing between the
lesser and the better argument and in deciding what constituted adequate proof.
Important also seems to be the development of the Hippocratics' medium, the
written prose treatise. In contrast to the writing of poetry, written prose
develops slowly in the Greek world; medical writers, historians, and writers of
political and judicial speeches seize upon it at approximately the same moment,
and in their hands written prose rapidly gains sophistication.
II. Formation of the Hippocratic Corpus
The figure of a concerned and conscientious physician attracted not only a
host of apocryphal legends about his great deeds, but also the heterogeneous
collection of early medical writings known as the Hippocratic Corpus. These
treatises collected under Hippocrates' name in Hellenistic times, certainly in
Alexandria by the middle of the Third Century B.C. Ancient scholar-physicians
who worked on the treatises as glossators and commentators were bothered by
their heterogeneity of styles and their contradictory contents, and they
borrowed methods current in Homeric criticism to explain them. Some suggested
that Hippocrates' life was prodigiously long (perhaps 109 years!) and that he
wrote some treatises when young and others when old; others conjectured that
instead of a single Hippocrates, there were seven, all members of the same
family, writing the treatises over several generations.
The "best" treatises were judged to be compositions from the hand of "The
Great Hippocrates, Father of Medicine" at the height of his intellectual powers.
Galen, practicing medicine at Rome in the latter half of the Second Century
A.D., is certain, for example, that Hippocrates himself wrote Epidemics I and
III, but that his son Thessalus must have discovered among his father's papers
after the old man's death Epidemics II, IV, and VI in the form of notes
scribbled on skins and wax tablets. The son, Galen supposes, misunderstood his
father's intentions, and although the lad expanded what he found, what he
published remained, in Galen's view, "unfinished works-in-progress."
Contradictions of fact also bothered subsequent readers, and the earliest
extant references to the Hippocratic Oath, from the First Century A.D., show
that Scribonius Largus, a physician who accompanied the Emperor Claudius to
Britain, and Soranus, a Greek physician who practiced at Rome, worried about the
provision that forbids giving a woman an abortive pessary, especially when the
Oath is juxtaposed to the fact that two writers of embryology in the Corpus
(Fleshes and Nature of the Child) describe aborted fetuses six and seven days
old and acknowledge that they witnessed or caused the abortions that produced
the fetuses.
Neither Scribonius Largus nor Soranus is worried about the historical and
scholarly issues regarding Hippocrates, but they do wonder about what the oath
prescribes for their own practice of medicine in Rome of the Principate. Each
decides that he can summon Hippocrates as authority on the use of abortives.
Scribonius Largus does so to prohibit all abortions, citing another Hippocratic
principle, namely that medicine is the art of healing, not harming. Soranus
decides that the Oath prohibits only abortive pessaries and that other
procedures are permitted when the life of the mother is in danger, and he adds
that he would never prescribe an abortive to preserve a woman's youthful beauty
or to conceal her adulteries.
III. The Corpus after Antiquity
The figure of Hippocrates as "Father of Medicine" remains a potent one in
medical circles throughout antiquity and beyond, although he is increasingly
viewed through Galen's lens, which pictures an Hippocrates who is very much like
Galen himself. Galen's enthusiasm for certain texts in the Hippocratic Corpus
was crucial to the continuing interest later physicians took in Hippocrates and
his writings, and Hippocratic texts were copied in sufficient numbers to survive
into Byzantine times and be reimported into the West during the Renaissance.
Renaissance anatomists, such as Vesalius and Paré, pointed with scorn to
mistaken deductions that Galen drew from his dissections on animals, and Galen's
influence suffered as a result. By contrast, once the Corpus was translated into
Latin early in the Sixteenth Century, the prestige of Hippocrates and his
writings escalated throughout Europe, as physicians continued the practice, now
more than a millennium and a half old, of combing the Corpus in search of
precedents for the medicine they were themselves currently practicing.
Only in the Twentieth Century have historians of medicine come round to
admitting that there is nothing to connect "Hippocrates," the famous physician
from Cos mentioned by Plato and Aristotle, with any single medical treatise in
our present Hippocratic Corpus. While the historians Herodotus and Thucydides
announce their names--"Herodotus of Halicarnassus" and "Thucydides the Athenian"
being the very first words of their histories--the medical writers of the Corpus
are nameless. They mention place names in the case histories of the Epidemics,
but the towns and villages named are where their patients lived, from Elis in
the western Peloponnese to Thasos in the northern Aegean and Perinthus and
Chalcedon along the northern coast of the Black Sea. From the Epidemics one gets
the impression of itinerant physicians, working in fairly close contact with one
another on the same and similar medical problems from strikingly similar points
of view, but writing them up in distinctive narrative styles.
IV. The Hippocratic Physician
This picture of the ancient physician coincides with what we know about
doctors from the Eighth to the Fifth Centuries B.C. in other sources. Already in
Homer's Iliad Podaleiris and Machaon, sons of Asclepius, accompany the Greek
armada to Troy, where they fight and heal. Machaon's skill draws the admiring
remark that "a healer is worth many men in his ability / to cut out arrows and
smear soothing medicaments on wounds" (Iliad XI.514-515). A nascent theory of
bodily humors, such as we see fully developed in the Corpus, operates in the
epics: balance is a sign of health, imbalance, a harbinger of disease. Cholê is
both Achilles' anger and the inner juice his body has accumulated in excess ever
since his days as a nursling at the breast.
Although medicine is an old technê, Hippocratics burst upon the medical
scene of the later Fifth Century as full participants in the intellectual
discussions and debates that mark the later Classical Period. They were
agonistic in stance and concerned with self-conscious presentation of their
medical technê and with its ability to guide the doctor in a logical movement
from theory to practice; that is, from nosological cause of diseases and
intellectual constructs for human physiology to the administration of proper
curative remedies.
V. Hippocratic Medicine
In common with other intellectuals in the Greek city-states, Hippocratics
are interested in ethnography and far-away places and peoples, in epidemic
diseases and plagues, in the origins of man and embryology, and in
valetudinarian dietetics. Like their contemporaries Euripides and Aristophanes,
Hippocratics are quick to pounce upon causes and remedies that they consider
irrational, and they too express their scorn for earlier ways of thinking. The
writer of Sacred Disease criticizes "witch-docotrs, faith-healers, quacks and
charlatans," whose etiology for epilepsy and sudden seizures invokes attacks
from the gods and whose therapies consist of purifications, incantations,
prohibition of baths, lying on goat-skins and eating goats' flesh (Sacred
Disease 1-2). The writer of Diseases of Young Girls censures women who follow
commands from Artemis' priests to dedicate costly garments to the goddess in the
effort to cure madness in the premenarchic young girl.
Both medical writers ground their etiology for the diseases in blockage of
inner vessels by a bodily humor; both consider sitting still and having your
feet go to sleep an appropriate analogy for the numbness that extinguishes the
senses in the diseases. Both base treatment on the evacuation of the noxious
fluid from vital areas of the body: the epileptic is to take a phlemagogue to
move excess phlegm gradually from his head so that its sudden descent into his
body doesn't overwhelm his senses, and the young girl is to sleep with a man as
soon as possible to remove the impediment at the mouth of her uterus, while
pregnancy will bring her long-lasting cure by opening up her body so that her
excess fluids can move about freely.
VI. The Hippocratics and "Rationalized" Medicine
Hippocratics find it important to absorb all human diseases within their
medical technê, including the very difficult sicknesses of sudden seizures and
premenarchic madness, and to this end they not only assign mechanical causes
that interact with the anatomy and physiology they endorse, but they also employ
therapies that reverse a diseased condition in accordance with the same
mechanical principles. "Opposites cure opposites" is a deliberate intellectual
stance in opposition to the "like cures like" of sympathetic magic. Hippocratics
know how to speak the language of science, and they are certainly the first in
the Western tradition to write medical science in a form that has survived to
our time. They formulate questions that the West has continued to ask: What
makes this person sick? Do women get sick in the same way as men? We can object
that neither a descent of phlegm from the head as an etiology for epilepsy, nor
a fantasy membrane at the mouth of the uterus in the young girl, is an
empirically visible phenomenon; and we can dismiss the medical content of their
science. We cling, however, to some of their deontology and medical ethics, as
summarized in the Hippocratic Oath.
What is important here is that these medical writers are asking not "Who
causes this sickness?" but rather, "By what process does this sickness occur?"
However imaginative their mechanistic explanations may be, Hippocratics can
defend them with arguments that appeal to process, not to a capricious or
malevolent deity, and they can explain the therapies they prescribe in terms of
the actions that their medicaments set in motion.
In the fourth century BCE the most important locus of medical thought and
practice was not the island home Cos of Hippocrates, but the great center of
Greek learning at Alexandria, founded in 331 BCE by Alexander the Great and
governed by a dynasty stemming from his general Ptolemy. The Ptolemaic rulers
gave lavish financial support to the library and museum at Alexandria which
consequently attracted researchers in all fields, including philosophy,
mathematics, history, poetry and medicine. Medical research in the Alexandrian
museum became world renowned. Two of its most influential investigators were
Herophilos of Chalcedon (fl. circa 280 BCE) and Erasistratos of Iulis (fl. 250
BCE). Most of our knowledge of these two is derived from later commentators,
such as Celsus and Galen in the Roman period. Herophilos’ most important
contribution to clinical medicine was his development of the theory of the
diagnostic value of the pulse. Although the pulse is referred to occasionally by
earlier writers (for example by Aristotle in his Inquiry Concerning Animals
521a5f), it was Herophilos’ teacher, Praxagoras, who first restricted the pulse
to a distinct group of vessels and held that it could be used as an indicator of
disease. Herophilos corrected his master’s teaching on several points,
maintaining that the pulse is not an innate faculty of the arteries, but one
they derive from the heart, and distinguishing the pulse not merely
quantitatively, but also qualitatively from palpitations, tremors and spasms,
which are muscular in origin.Roman wall painting from Boscoreale, first century BCE Citharista
Herophilos elaborated a far-reaching doctrine of the pulse. The essential
phenomenon in the pulse, according to Herophilos, is rhythm, as in music. To
understand the pulse, then, we must study the theory of music. Herophilos was
chiefly guided by the musical theories of Aristoxenus of Tarentum, a Peripatetic
philosopher and a musician, a pupil of Aristotle. By following this route, the
doctrine of the pulse became so complicated that no one but a skilled musician
could possibly understand it. Thus, the theory was still-born.
Erasistratos, Herophilos’ rival at Alexandria, made remarkable progress in
anatomy. Erasistratos described the brain more accurately than Herophilos. He
distinguished the cerebrum from the cerebellum, and he determined that the brain
was the originating point for all nerves. He distinguished sensory from motor
nerves and he was the first to dispel the notion that nerves are hollow and
filled with pneuma (air); but are solid, consisting of marrow of the spinal
kind. In his account of the heart and its function, he distinguished between
pulmonary and systemic circulation.
Jacques-Louis David, 1774 “Erasistratus Discovering the Cause of Antiochus’ Disease” Antiochus, son of Seleucus I Nicator, King of Syria, was dangerously ill,
and, when other physicians failed to help him, Erasistratos was called in. While
he was examining the patient, Stratonice, a young woman, one of the elderly
king’s wives, entered the room. From the quickening of the sick man’s pulse and
from the flush which spread over his cheeks, the doctor recognized that the
illness was mental rather than physical--that a passion for his inaccessible
step-mother was at the root of the trouble.
Dissection and Vivisection
In Alexandria the dissection of corpses was a regular practice, whereas
before it had been condemned on religious principle and thus outlawed. Celsus
reported the rumor that the anatomists used living people, most likely condemned
criminals, in vivisection. The changed attitude to dissection among learned men
was due to the philosophical teachings of Aristotle. First Plato had taught that
the soul was an independent and immortal being which during earthly life carried
the body as a mere envelope and instrument to be discarded at death. Then
Aristotle, Plato’s pupil, declared that the soul, though not separable and
immortal, constituted a higher value than the whole organism, implying that
after death there was no more than a physical frame remaining, without feelings
or rights. From this position it was no great leap to claiming that the dead
body could justly be used for dissection and anatomical study. In the period
following their lifetimes, the Hellenistic period, the greatest medical
discoveries of antiquity were made in a place called Alexandria. Because of limited field of science in past, a scientist, mostly, knew
with many sciences. "Hakim", who throughout history of Iran, was the central,
principal figure in the dissemination of science, usually also was a physician.
So close was relationship between Hakim and Doctor, that the latter, just like
philosopher, was similarly called "Hakim". Thus many of the most famous
philosophers and scientists, such as Avicenna (Ebne Sina) and Averroes (Ebne
Roshd), were also physicians, earning their living by way of medical
practice. Development of theorical and applied Islamic era Medicine in Iran began
with Muslims' conquest of Jondishapour and Alexandria, then prominent centers in
both regards. In the early days of Islamic era, medical school and hospital of
Jondishapour formed a local point of science, particularly medicine, housing
Iranian, Indian, Roman and Greek physicians active in theorical and clinical
aspects of this science. In Alexandria, Greek and Egyptian medicine, backed with
the wealth of ancient traditions of their own, were quite prosperous/ In these two cities, Muslims became acquainted with Greek, Iranian,
Indian and Egyptian medicine, as well as with such masters as Hippocrates,
Galleons, Dioscorides, ... In 8th century A.D., thanks to the peace and unity, that appeared in
Iran, medicine and practitioners of this science acquired a lofty status and
Jondishapour resumed its activity as the large center of Iranian Medicine,
dynasties as Bakhtishu and Massuyeh laying its foundations. Jerjis, from Bakhtishu dynasty and a physician in Jondishapour, achieved
fame as the first doctor. Massuyeh, also a physician in Jondishapour, during 8th
century A.D., became the personal physician of Harounolrashid, also. In the late of 8th century A.D., the first medical book, entitled
"Delfolein", was written by Massuyeh's son, Yuhanna, followed by "Ali ebne Raban
Tabari" (Razi's teacher), who compiled his important book "Ferdowsolhekmat" in
850 A.D. During 9th century A.D., a colossal movement of translation and
compilation of medical, medicinal, pharmacological, botanical and zoological
books began, which resulted in the translation of numerous volumes from Greek,
Syrian, Pahlavi and Indian into Arabic, the formal language.. In 9th century A.D., "Honain ebne Eshaq" became famous at the most
prolific translator, having translated 99 medical treatises into Arabic. Among
those who dioscorides' important De Materi Medica, which he translated from
Syrian. A treasury of pharmacological, botanical and zoological knowledge, this
translation, "Ketabolhashaesh Fi Hayouloteb", soon became a major reference work
for pharmacologists and chemists. "Sabet ebne Qara" (835-900 A.D.) was also famous as a prominent physician
and great translator. He has translated numerous works from Greek to Arabic, as
well as written several medical books and treatises. In 10-11th centuries A.D., medicine achieved its utmost splendor with the
works of "Mohammad Zechariah Razi", "Ali ebne Abbas Majusi" and "Ebne Sina"
(Avicenna). Services rendered by Razi and Avicenna to medical science, caused
Iranian Medicine to become known by their works and to have far-reaching effects
upon this science throughout the world. Razi was the student of "Ali ebne Raban Tabari". He was the greatest
clinical physician, who long directed hospitals of Rey and Baqdad. In his book
"Tebbe Mansouri" (Mansouri Medicine), Anatomical knowledge could be assessed. In
another book "Havi", the greatest medical opus in Arabic language, includes all
that was needed to a physician; and in another "Tebbe Rohani", discusses mental
disorders, psychology and psychotherapy. After Razi, "Ali ebne Abbas Majusi" (death: 995 A.D.) counts among the
prominent doctors of the world and his written works greatly contributed to
development of medical science. He was personal physician of "Azedodoleh" in
Shiraz. His venerable opus "Kamelossanaeh" or "Tebbe Maleki", was the most read
medical book in of its time. In 10th
century A.D., the first medical book in "Persian Text",
entitled "Hedayatolmotoalemin", was written by "Abubakr Rabi ebne Ahmad Bukhari
Akhaveini". 10th century A.D. saw the advent of Abu Ali Sina (Avicenna: 980-1036),
the greatest Iranian physician, whose works embody the culmination of medical
science. His book "Qanoun" was the most effective, most read medical book and it
was reprinted numerous times in Europe during Renaissance. His contemporary,
physician "Abu Mansour Movafaq ebne Ali Heravi", compiled "Alabnieh Anelhaqaeq
Aladvieh", dealing with pharmacology, herb logy and botany, in Persian
Text. In 12th century A.D., medicine pursued its development with works of
"Ismail Jorjani" and "Fakhr Razi". Jorjani, illustrious doctor, served as Court
Physician of Kharazmshahi dynasty and Seljuk Soltan Sanjar. In 1110 A.D., he
compiled venerable "Zechariah Kharazmshahi", which brings together Razi's Havi,
Avicenna's Qanoun and a treasury of pharmacological knowledge within 10 volumes
in Persian and Arabic texts. This, soon became one of the most read medical
books. Fakhredin Razi is another philosopher and physician from 13th century
A.D., whose book "Sharhe Koliat Qanoun Ebne Sina", was instrumental in
development of this science. During 13th century A.D. (1275), great scientist, "Zechariah Qazvini"
wrote his "Ajaebol Makhluqat", several chapters of which deal with medical
science, botany, zoology and pharmacology. In 14th century A.D., Rashidedin Fazlolah", great minister of Ilkhanid
dynasty, was among the patrons of medical science. In addition to compiling a
medical encyclopedia, for researchers, he instituted a prize soon contested by
scholars and doctors from as far as Andalusia, Tunisia and Tripoli. In 15th century, interest in anatomy developed and the first illustrated
book, entitled "Tashrihol Abdan" or Kefayat Mansouri", was prepared by "Mansour
ebne Mohammad ebne Ahmad Elias Shirazi" in 1395. In this book, Greek and Indian
embryological conceptions are discussed alongside anatomical illustrations. Between 16th and 18th century A.D., during which Safavid dynasty ruled
over Iran, works of Mohammad Hosseini Nourbakhshi, Hakim Momen and Mozafar
Shafai further magnified medicine. Nourbakhshi was the first to identify "hay fever" and "whooping cough"
and his book "Kholasatot Tajrobeh" was well known. Hakin Momen Tohfeh, which includes pre-Safavid medical knowledge and
experiences of the author and his contemporary masters, was still consulted in
Iran. Maybe, Safavid era could be considered the golden age of Iranian
pharmacology. Mozafar Shafai, son of Mohammad Hosseini Isfahani Kashani, lived
under Shah Abbas 1 and was a great physician of that epoch. In addition to
several other books, he wrote his famous book "Qarabadin Shafai" in 1555 A.D.,
an invaluable source of pharmacological knowledge currently consulted in Iran
and India. In the course of 19th century, with gradual introduction of European
medicine during Qajar period, Iranian medical community bade the ancient world
farewell and with inauguration of "Darol Fonoun Polytechnic" (1850), western
medicine acquired official status in Iran. Among the founders of modern medicine in Iran, one may cite Austrian Dr.
Polack, Dutch Dr. Schlimmer and Dr. Albaux, who were instructors in Darol
Fonoun. In 1855, Dr. Albaux's surgery book and Dr. Polack's book "Vazidatol
Hekmat" were published. In 1862, Schlimmer books "Shafaieh" and "Serolhekmat"
were lithographed with Persian titles. "Treatise on Small-Pox Vaccination" seems to have been one of the first
books printed in 1923 in Tabriz.
Brain surgery is perhaps the oldest of the practiced medical arts. No hard evidence exists suggesting a beginning to the practice of other facets of medicine such as pharmacology -- using drugs, chemical and natural ingredients to help a fellow human being. There is ample evidence, however, of brain surgery, dating back to the Neolithic (late Stone Age) period.
Unearthed remains of successful brain operations, as well as surgical
implements, were found in France-- at one of Europe's noted archeological digs.And, the success rate was remarkable, even circa 7,000 B.C.
But, pre-historic evidence of brain surgery was not limited to Europe.
Pre-Incan civilization used brain surgery as an extensive practice as early as
2,000 B.C. In Paracas, Peru, a desert strip south of Lima, archeologic evidence
indicates that brain surgery was used extensively. Here, too, an inordinate
success rate was noted as patients were restored to health. The treatment was
used for mental illnesses, epilepsy, headaches, organic diseases, osteomylitis,
as well as head injuries.
Brain surgery was also used for both spiritual and magical reasons; often,
the practice was limited to kings, priests and the nobility.
Surgical tools in South America were made of both bronze and man-shaped
obsidian (a hard, sharp-edged volcanic rock).
Africa showed evidence of brain surgery as early as 3,000 B.C. in papyrus
writings found in Egypt. "Brain," the actual word itself, is used here for the
first time in any language. Egyptian knowledge of anatomy may have been
rudimentary, but the ancient civilization did contribute important notations on
the nervous system.
Hippocrates, the father of modern medical ethics, left many texts on brain
surgery. Born on the Aegean Island of Cos in 470 B.C., Hippocrates was quite
familiar with the clinical signs of head injuries. He also described seizures
accurately, as well as spasms and classified head contusions, fractures and
depressions. Many concepts found in his texts were still in good stead two
thousand years after his death in 360 B.C.
Ancient Rome in the first century A.D. had its brain surgeon star, Aulus
Cornelius Celsus. Hippocrates did not operate on depressed skull fractures;
Celsus often did. Celsus also described the symptoms of brain injury in great
detail.
Asia was home to many talented brain surgeons: Galenus of Pergamon, born in
Turkey, and the physicians of Byzance such as Oribasius (4th century) and Paul
of Aegina. An Islamic school of brain surgery also flourished from 800 to 1200
A.D., the height of Islamic influence in the world. Abu Bekr Muhammed el Razi,
who lived from 852 to 932 in the Common Era, was perhaps the greatest of Islamic
brain srugeons. A second Islamic brain surgeon, Abu l'Qluasim Khalaf, lived and
practiced in Cordoba, Spain, and was one of the great influences on western
brain surgery.
The Christian surgeons of the Middle Ages were clerics, well educated,
knowledgeable in Latin, and familiar with the realm of medical literature.
Despite the church's ban on study of anatomy, many churchmen of great renown
(advisors and confessors to a succession of Popes) were outstanding physicians
and surgeons. Leonardo Davinci's portfolio containing hundreds of accurate
anatomical sketches indicates the intense intellectual interest in the workings
of the human body despite the Church's ban.
Surgery and Pain¢“In case of amputation, it was the custom to bring the
patient into the operating room and place him upon the table. [The surgeon]
would stand with his hands behind his back and would say to the patient, “Will
you have your leg off, or will you not have it off?” If the patient lost
courage and said, “No,” he had decided not to have the leg amputated, he was at
once carried back to his bed in the ward. If, however, he said, “Yes,” he was
immediately taken firmly in hand by a number of strong assistants and the
operation went on regardless of whatever he might say thereafter. If his
courage failed him after this crucial moment, it was too late and no attention
was paid to his cries of protest. It was found to be the only practicable
method by which an operation could be performed under the gruesome conditions
which prevailed before the advent of anesthesia
Al-Razi is attributed to be the first to use the Seton in surgery and
animal gut for sutures . He was the first to use silk sutures and alcohol for
hemostasis . He was the first to use alcohol as an antiseptic .
Ibn Sina originated the idea of the use of oral anesthetics . The Arabs
invented the soporific sponge, which was the precursor of modern anesthesia. It
was a sponge soaked with aromatics and narcotics and held to the patient's
nostrils . The use of anesthesia was one of the reasons for the rise of surgery
in the Islamic world to the level of an honorable specialty, while in Europe,
surgery was belittled and practiced by barbers and quacks. The Council of Tours
in 1163 CE declared "Surgery is to be abandoned by the schools of medicine and
by all decent physicians." . Burton stated that "anesthetics have been used in
surgery throughout the East for centuries before ether and chloroform became the
fashion in civilized west.."
AL-ZAHRAWI
Abu al-Qasim Khalaf Ibn Abbas al-Zahrawi (930-1013 CE) known to the west as
Abulcasis, Bucasis, or
Alzahravius is considered to be the most famous surgeon in Islamic
medicine. In his book Al-Tasrif, he described hemophilia for the first time in
medical history. The book contains the description and illustration of about 200
surgical instruments, many of which devised by Zahrawi himself . In it Zahrawi
stresses the importance of the study of Anatomy as a fundamental prerequisite to
surgery . He advocated the reimplantation of a fallen tooth and the use of
dental prosthesis carved from cow's bone, and improvement over the wooden
dentures worn by the first President of America, George Washington, seven
centuries later . Zahrawi appears to be the first surgeon in history to sue
cotton (Arabic word) in surgical dressings in the control of hemorrhage, as
padding in the splinting of fractures, as a vaginal padding in fractures of the
pubic, and in dentistry. He introduced the method for the removal of kidney
stones by cutting into the urinary bladder. He was the first to teach the
lithotomy position for vaginal operations . He described tracheotomy,
distinguished between goiter and cancer of the thyroid, and the invention of a
cauterizing iron, which he also used to control bleeding. His description of
varicose veins stripping, even after ten centuries, is almost like modern
surgery . In orthopedic surgery he introduced what is called today Kocher's
method of reduction of shoulder dislocation and patelectomy . 1,000 years before
Brook reintroduced it in 1937 .
![]() IBN SINA
Ibn Sina's description of the surgical treatment of cancer holds true even
today after 1,000 years. He says the excision must be wide and bold; all veins
running to the tumor must be included in the amputation. Even if this is not
sufficient, then the area affected should be cauterized . His recommendation of
wine as the best dressing for wounds was very popular in medireview practice .
The surgeons of Islam practiced three types of surgery; vascular, general,
and orthopedic. Ophthalmic surgery was a specialty, which was quite distinct
both from medicine and surgery. They freely opened the abdomen and drained the
peritoneal cavity in the approved modern style. To an unnamed surgeon of Shiraz
is attributed the first colostomy operation. Liver abscesses were treated by
puncture and exploration.
Surgeons all over the world practice today unknowingly several surgical
procedures that Zahrawi introduced 1,000 years ago .
Edward Jenner is alongside the likes of Joseph Lister, Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur in medical history. Edward Jenner was born in 1749 and died in 1823. Edward Jenner’s great gift to the world was his vaccination for smallpox. This disease was greatly feared at the time as it killed one in three of those who caught it and badly disfigured those who were lucky enough to survive catching it.
Edward Jenner was a country doctor who had studied nature and his natural surroundings since childhood. He had always been fascinated by the rural old wives tale that milkmaids could not get smallpox. He believed that there was a connection between the fact that milkmaids only got a weak version of smallpox – the non-life threatening cowpox – but did not get smallpox itself. A milkmaid who caught cowpox got blisters on her hands and Jenner concluded that it must be the pus in the blisters that somehow protected the milkmaids. Jenner decided to try out a theory he had developed. A young boy called James Phipps would be his guinea pig. He took some pus from cowpox blisters found on the hand of a milkmaid called Sarah. She had milked a cow called Blossom and had developed the tell-tale blisters. Jenner ‘injected’ some of the pus into James. This process he repeated over a number of days gradually increasing the amount of pus he put into the boy. He then deliberately injected Phipps with smallpox. James became ill but after a few days made a full recovery with no side effects. It seemed that Jenner had made a brilliant discovery. He then encountered the prejudices and conservatism of the medical world that dominated London. They could not accept that a country doctor had made such an important discovery and Jenner was publicly humiliated when he brought his findings to London. However, what he had discovered could not be denied and eventually his discovery had to be accepted – a discovery that was to change the world. So successful was Jenner's discovery, that in 1840 the government of the day banned any other treatment for smallpox other than Jenner's. Jenner did not patent his discovery as it would have made the vaccination more expensive and out of the reach of many. It was his gift to the world. A small museum now exists in his home town. It was felt that this was appropriate for a man who shunned the limelight and London. In the museum are the horns of Blossom the cow. The word vaccination comes from the Latin ‘vacca’ which means cow – in honour of the part played by Blossom and Sarah in Jenner’s research. A more formal statue of Jenner is tucked away in one of the more quiet areas of Hyde Park in London. As a young man, Jenner also wrote about what he had seen cuckoos doing. His were the first written records to describe a baby cuckoo pushing the eggs and the young of its host out of the nest so that the baby cuckoo was the only one to receive food from its foster parents. This was only confirmed many years later but it stands as a testament to the importance of the countryside for Jenner. If he had gone to a city to further his career, would he had been in the right environment to make his famous discovery? In 1980, the World Health Organisation declared that smallpox was extinct throughout the world. The impact of Jenner's vaccination can be seen in its impact in London in 1844: Smallpox was a major killer before Edward Jenner's vaccination that was to change medical history. Whilst Jenner’s vaccinatioon did not eradicate smallpox, it had a marked impact on fatality rates in large and dirty cities such as London. Smallpox casualties in London in 1844: Alexander Fleming is alongside the likes of Edward Jenner, Robert
Koch, Christian Barnard and Louis Pasteur in medical history. Alexander Fleming discovered what
was to be one of the most powerful of all antibiotics – penicillin. This drug
was to change the way disease was treated and cement Fleming’s name in history. One of the most important medical advances in history began by accident. On the morning of September 3rd, 1928, Professor Alexander Fleming was having a clear up of his cluttered laboratory. He was sorting through a number of glass plates that had previously been coated with staphyloccus bacteria as part of research Fleming was doing. One of the plates had mould on it. The mould was in the shape of a ring and the area around the ring seemed to be free of the bacteria staphyloccus. The mould was penicillium notatum. Fleming had a life long interest in ways of killing off bacteria and he concluded that the bacteria on the plate around the ring had been killed off by some substance that had come from the mould. Further research on the mould found that it could kill other bacteria and that it could be given to small animals without any side effects. However, within a year, Fleming had moved onto other medical issues and it was ten years later that Howard Florey and Ernst Chain, working at Oxford University, isolated the bacteria-killing substance found in the mould - penicillin. IN 1941, a doctor, Charles Fletcher, at a hospital in Oxford had heard of their work. He had a patient who was near to death as a result of bacteria getting into a wound. Fletcher used some of Chain’s and Florey’s penicillin on the patient and the wound made a spectacular recovery. Unfortunately, Fletcher did not have enough penicillin to fully rid the patient’s body of bacteria and he died a few weeks later as the bacteria took a hold. However, penicillin had shown what it could do on what had been a lost cause. The only reason the patient did not survive was because they did not have enough of the drug - not that it did not work. Florey got an American drugs company to mass produce it and by D-Day (June 6th 1944), enough was available to treat all the bacterial infections that broke out among the troops. Penicillin got nicknamed "the wonder drug" and in 1945 Fleming, Chain and Florey were awarded the Nobel Prize for medicine. Post-1945 was the era of the antobiotics. Howard Florey is as linked to penicillin as Sir Alexander Fleming is. Howard Florey, who developed a way of mass producing penicillin, should be seen as being as important as Jenner, Koch, Pasteur and Lister in the history of medicine.
Florey was born on September 24th 1898, in Adelaide, Australia. He died on February 21st, 1968, at Oxford in England. He trained as a pathologist who, with Ernst Chain isolated and purified penicillin (discovered in 1928 by Sir Alexander Fleming) for general clinical use. This mass production of penicillin proved to e vital to soldiers during World War Two where diseases that had previously been difficult to cure in a combat situation could now be treated far more effectively. For this research and achievement, Florey, Chain, and Fleming shared the Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine in 1945. Florey studied medicine at Adelaide and Oxford universities until 1924. After holding teaching and research posts at Cambridge and Sheffield universities, he was professor of pathology at Oxford between 1935 and 1962. He was appointed provost of Queen's College, Oxford in 1962, and chancellor of the Australian National University, Canberra (1965), positions he held until his death. He was knighted in 1944 and made life peer in 1965. Florey investigated tissue inflammation and secretion of mucous membranes. He succeeded in purifying lysozyme, a bacteria-destroying enzyme found in tears and saliva, and characterized the substances acted upon by the enzyme. In 1939 he surveyed other naturally occurring anti-bacterial substances, concentrating on penicillin. With Chain, he demonstrated its curative properties in human studies and developed methods for its mass production. Following World War II and the work of his research team in North Africa, penicillin came into widespread clinical use Christian Barnard’s place in medial history is based on the fact that Barnard performed the first open heart transplant in history. In 2002 such operations are common but in the late 1960’s operations on the heart were rarely performed because of the risk of death and heart transplants were unheard of. Christian Barnard was a pioneer of organ transplants and he must be placed alongside the likes of Pasteur, Lister, Koch, Fleming, Florey and Jenner in any list of medical giants. Christian Barnard was born in South Africa in 1922. He worked as a surgeon at the Groote Schuur hospital in Cape Town. After further training in America, he became a leading heart surgeon. Barnard studied heart surgery at the University of Minnesota in the US and returned to South Africa to set up a cardiac unit in Cape Town. In December 1967 he transplanted the heart of a road accident victim into a 59 year old man, Louis Washkansky. This was the first operation of its kind and made Barnard a household name worldwide - fame that took him by surprise. Asked to describe his feelings after the Washkansky transplant, Barnard said:
Unfortunately, Washkansky died 18 days later from pneumonia. The drugs used to prevent the body rejecting the new heart adversely weakened his resistance to infection. One of Barnard's patients lived for over a year and a half after surgery, but patients needed drugs to prevent the body rejecting the donor heart. These left them open to infection and many died, just like Louis Washkansky. After a while, all heart operations stopped because the risk of failure was considered too high. In 1974 a researcher working in Norway discovered a new drug called cyclosporin. This drug helped to overcome the body's rejection of the donor organs and protected the patient against infection. Subsequent heart transplants were more successful and since the late 1980s, the majority of patients have survived for more than two years after surgery. Barnard had demonstrated that heart transplants were possible. Even though many of his patients died soon after their operation, he had taken the first steps into a new form of surgery which is now routine in medical practice. In 1974, Christian Barnard carried out the first double heart transplant. He ended his career in surgery because of the impact of arthritis. Barnard died in 2001, ironically of disease to his heart.
![]() ![]()
The Demonstration of anesthesia Massachusetts 1846
Seven pounds sterling for amputation and cure of your leg. As a young doctor he was particularly interested in obstetrics, and distressed by the sadness of the results. He started to use such forceps as were then available, with little success. He set off in 1739, to study in London, and briefly Paris. Finally he returned to London, and set up in a very mean apothecary's shop, on or just off Pall Mall, with a paper lantern at the door --Midwifery taught for five shillings.
CAESAREAN SECTION The other treatment for obstructed labour is Caesarean section. The oldest reference to Caesarean section on the dead mother was in the Roman Law of Numa Pompilius. (715-673 BC). There is no doubt that this was sometimes successful, but there is no good documentation of section with survival of both mother and child. The practice was revived at the Renaissance, and good stories abound. One tells how in 1500 Jacob Nufer, a Swiss sow gelder called in all thirteen of the local midwives unsuccessfully. Then he called in the two local lithotomists, in vain. So he did the obvious and did the job himself. Mother and child survived, she to bear him several more children. Over the next two centuries a few more sections were probably carried out with survival of mother and child. The most clearly documented acount is that by Scipione Mercurio (1540- 1615) given in his text first published in 1596. He gives a detailed and illustrated account of how to make the incision, with four strong assistants to hold the patient down. Afterwards he applied a decoction of artemisia, agrimony, betony, mallow, flowers of pomegranate, dried roses, birthwort, sedge and sweet smelling bulrushes in sour black wine. The survival statistics were not clear. There is a gap in the historical record; then in 1793 in Manchester England, Jane Foster, whose pelvis was deformed after being crushed accidentally, survived a Caesarean section by Dr James Barlow; the baby was dead. There followed a period during which several mothers and babies were lost, and in which the opponents of section offered symphysiotomy and the use of the crotchet to destroy the foetus. Section won out, as the better of two bad options. At this time the famous French obstetrician Baudeloque published a book reviewing the 31 successful Caesarean sections done in the previous fifty years. A copy of the English translation of this book passed to a backwoods Virginia doctor, who recorded the fact that he performed caesarean section on his own wife by annotation in the margin of his own copy "14 Jany 1794 JB on EB up 9 Feby walked 15 Feby Cured on 1 March." The mother survived for 25 years, and the baby for 77. The operation was done under laudanum, on two planks set across two barrels. Dr Jesse Bennett removed both ovaries remarking as he did so that he would not be subjected to such an ordeal again. But Caesarian section was rarely attempted and rarely successful before Listerian antisepsis. Thus in 1849 Dr Radford of Manchester reported that he had lost 3 mothers and babies out of 5 attempts, even with anaesthesia; in 1900 Dr Sinclair at the same centre reported 10 out of 10 successes.
|
Prehistoric and Primitive MedicineArchaeologists and anthropologists who study prehistoric man and primitive tribes tell us human societies have always had special individuals, both men and women, who took the job of healer and were responsible for preventing illness and curing the sick and injured. These shaman almost always held multiple roles as healers, magicians, rulers, or priests.Primitive medicine men learned how to splint, but probably not set, bone fractures. They also frequently performed a type of brain surgery that we today call trephination. Trephination was done by using stone instruments to bore or grind holes in the skull. Researchers do not know if the procedure was done to relieve demon spirits, treat skull fractures, or remove bone splinters. It is possible that trephination was done at different times for all of these reasons. In addition to magic, spells, prayers, and charms, shaman and healers often used signature, or symbolic, items to treat their patients. These signature treatments included things like drinking the blood of a warrior to increase strength or eating leaves shaped like body organs to cure a disease. Sometimes, through chance, these signatures worked. When they did, the medicine men, or shamans, would pass the information to the next generation of priests. Digitalis, morphine, quinine, and ephedrine are all modern medicines that have been passed down to us from prehistoric signature practice. Imhotep -- Father of Egyptian MedicineMost educated estimates of when medicine first appeared lead us to Ancient Egypt. Around 2725 B.C., a man by the name of Imhotep was practicing medicine, building pyramids, and indulging in astrology. Imhotep existed as a mythological figure in the minds of most scholars until the end of the nineteenth century, when he was established as a real historical personage.
The Egyptian civilization is one of the oldest in history. The history of Ancient Egypt is divided into thirty dynasties, the last dynasty ending with the invasion of Egypt by Alexander the Great in 332 BC. This classification was proposed by Manethon in 280 BC. The Graeco-Roman Period (332 BC-641 AD) ended with Egypt becoming a province of the Empire of the Caliphs. Table I summarizes the different periods of Ancient Egypt, it is of note that different authors may give different dates. The Egyptian civilization was renowned for its scientific and artistic achievements. The great monuments it left behind are its living evidence. Medicine was no exception and mummification stands out as one of the most famous achievements in that field. Doctors in Ancient Egypt
Homer (c.700 BC) describes the Egyptian doctors in the Odyssey thus: 'For
the fertile soil of Egypt is most rich in herbs, many of which are wholesome in
solution, though many are poisonous. In medical knowledge the Egyptian leaves
the rest of the world behind. He is a true son of Paeon the Healer'.
The Greeks used to go to Egypt to study medicine and there is enough
evidence to show that Hippocrates (460-375 BC) and the Hippocratic School were
much influenced by the Ancient Egyptian writings when they wrote their
treatises. The god Thoth was called the first physician and the first surgeon. A
doctor in Ancient Egypt was named Sinw, which in Coptic is written (CENI). The
prefix (Met) is added to form the noun, thus (Metceni). It is worth mentioning
that the word medicine derives its origin from Sinw. The symbol for doctor
comprised of a scalpel (or lancet), a container for medicines and a seated man.
It is thus appropriate to say that physicians should rest assured that the word
'medicine' does not mean them exclusively, but it encompasses the surgeons as
well! A lady doctor is Sinw.t (t is the feminine sign). The first lady doctor in
history is Peseshet, of the 6th Dynasty. There were physicians for the public;
and physicians for the Royal Court, Sinw pr-c, who may be for the King and/or
Queen, as well as the royal household and employees of the palace. Some of the
Sinw pr-c also had the title of 'Physicians delegated to foreign lands'. They
would be sent by the pharaoh of Egypt at the request of the ruler of another
country, who used to ask pharaoh to send a trusted physician from Egypt, the
land of medicine at the time, for treating their illnesses.
There were also spiritual doctors, Sa.u, who were mostly priests (a kind of
psychiatrist). The highest rank among the hierarchy of doctors was Chief of
Physicians of the North, of the South, of the North and South or of the South
and North (of the country as a whole): wr sinw mhw-sm, and Master Physicians,
hry-sinw. The highest rank among physicians was responsible to the Vizier, a
politician who was next to the Monarch. Table II illustrates the medical
hierarchy in Ancient Egypt and its present day equivalent.
There were different grades of doctors in Ancient Egypt, thus there was the
ordinary Sinw who was a physician, Wrsinw who was a Chief Physician, the Sahsinw
who was a Medical Inspector, Imj-ra-sinw who was a Director of Medicine
(Overseer) and Hrp-sinw who was the Commander (Controller, Master) of Medicine.
Ghaliounguie numerated one hundred and fifty five physicians in Ancient Egypt,
but it is possible that only one hundred and twenty of these had the title of
Sinw, 'medical man'.
Physicians were assisted by aides, nurses, masseurs and bandagists. Some would have their own textbooks as the 'Book of the Bandagists'. Among the doctors in Ancient Egypt were specialists and it is worth recounting the words of Herodotus (Euterpe II, 84) 'The art of medicine thus divided amongst them: each physician applies himself to only one disease, and not more. All places abound in physicians; some physicians are for the eyes, others for the head, others for the teeth and others for the parts about the belly and others for internal disorders' .It is quite clear that Herodotus took this point of specialization too far as there were also general practitioners; perhaps he did not emphasize this as it was too obvious! One of the most famous specialities was ophthalmology and an occulist was known as sinw ir.tj as blindness was not uncommon in Ancient Egypt being caused by trachoma that was prevalent then, as nowadays. Seven occulists have been identified in Ancient Egypt. There were also internists, gynaecologists, but there were also some vague specialities such as 'guardian of the anus' considered as "protologists". There were also doctors for the cemeteries. In the Middle Kingdom appeared a physician assigned to the troops. In the New Kingdom appeared a title of 'Chief Physician of the Palace of Life' that seems to be mostly an administrative position- a kind of Minster of Health. There were also dentists and makers of false teeth. There were physicians on the boats sailed by Ancient Egyptians on the high seas. Groups of labourers, e.g., miners had their own doctors. There are some authorities who believe that priests of Sekhmet (an Ancient
Egyptian goddess) were surgeons, but Grapow threw doubt on this idea. There were
no ENT surgeons as such, but there were 'Head Doctors', supposedly including
those who dealt with the nose and throat and ears. Ni-Ankh-Sekhmet is supposed
to have been the first rhinologist in history. Table III illustrates the
different types of doctors in Ancient Egypt.
![]() In Ancient Egypt there was no money economy; barter and services were an
alternative. Diodorus Siculus (1,82,3) mentioned that in Egypt many people had
free medical care. Temple physicians also served the general public. Many
physicians were paid by the state or private persons but private medicine
flourished after some time. Some physicians attained great wealth and this can
be evidenced from ancient writings and also by the splendour of their bombs. To
physicians was ascribed the duties of veterinaries; supervising cattle and
possibly healing them. The Kahun Papyrus deals in part with veterinary medicine.
Pharmacists were a separate profession.
Papyri
Our knowledge of the nature of medicine in Ancient Egypt is contrived
mostly from the medical papyri, which outlived the mighty hand of time to reach
us nowadays. Most of these papyri are fragmented, but they do give a reasonable
idea of how medicine was at that time. These papyri have the name of those who
discovered them or the places they were or their later site of location. The
most famous are the Ebers Papyrus, the Edwin Smith Papyrus, the Kahun Papyrus
and the Hearst Papyrus (see Table IV). The Berlin Papyrus (c.1300 BC, 19th
Dynasty) contains a few paragraphs on diseases of the ear.
The Edwin Smith Papyrus (c.1600 BC) resembles the Hippocratic treatises
suggesting a long foreground to Greek medicine. At its outset it deals with the
heart and arteries and possibly the counting of the pulse is mentioned. Though
there was no apparatus to accurately measure time, it is possible that the
physician counted the pulse of the patient against his own, thus recognizing
whether the pulse is normal, slow or rapid.
There are forty-eight clinical cases of surgical importance mentioned in
topographical order of the organs affected starting with the head first:
Skull, overlying soft tissue, brain Cases 1-10
Nose Cases 11-14
Maxillary Region Cases 15-17
Temporal Region Cases 18-22
Ears, mandible, lips and chin Cases 23-27
Throat, neck, cervical vertebrae Cases 28-33
The script includes sound anatomical, physiological, diagnostic and
prognostic information. Some of the treatments prescribed still hold true till
our present day such as reduction of a dislocated jaw and reduction of fractures
of the clavicle.
The following therapeutic accessories are mentioned in the papyrus:
Dressings for wounds:
Lint (ftt) is of vegetable origin: it can be used dry to absorb secretions
(on throat, Edwin Smith, case 28) or impregnated with medicaments for local
application (in ear, Ebers, Case 91, 767).
Linen: made of flax, is used in different forms (Ebers, Case 91, 767).
Sutures (Edwin Smith, Case 10); the first description in the history of
suturing (Sullivan, 1996).
Splints: 3 types (possibly 4) are described:
Brace of wood padded with linen (Edwin Smith, Case 7) is inserted into the
mouth to help feeding the patient.
Splint made of linen (Edwin Smith, Case 35, fractured clavicle).
Stiff post-like roll of linen (Edwin Smith, Cases 11 and 12, fractured
nose).
It is possible that cartonnage was used, similar to our plaster of Paris to
splint fractures, also made of linen.
Cautery: either by means of the fire-drill or with a heated scalpel.
Breasted attributes the Edwin Smith Papyrus to Imhotep, the Vizier,
physician, architect and High Priest of Heliopolis, who built the first pyramid
(Step Pyramid) for King Zoser (3rd Dynasty, c.2800 BC). Imhotep was also known
as a sage, scribe and astronomer. He was later ranked as full god and accepted
as the deity of medicine. He was identified with Aesculapius. It is also
believed that the Berlin Medical Papyrus and much of the Ebers Papyrus, as well
as the Edwin Smith papyrus, are copies of an original written by an early
physician, perhaps Imhotep.
The Ebers Papyrus (c.1500 BC), the longest and only complete one of all the
papyri, deals with 250 clinical pictures in 887 paragraphs which include
leprosy, anasarca, heart disease (causing oedema or faintness) with sections on
the nose, ears, tongue, gums and teeth. It is of interest that the sections on
the nose and ear follow each other (Cases 90-92, 761-770).
The circulation of the blood was mentioned in this papyrus well before the
time of William Harvey (1578-1657) and percussion was also mentioned as a method
of diagnosis more than 30 centuries before Auenbrugger (1722-1809). It is
considered to be the only surviving book of the so-called Hermetic Books.
Clement of Alexandria (AD 200) recorded that the Egyptian Priests possessed
forty-two books that contained the sum of human knowledge. These books were
called by the Greeks the 'Hermetic Books', because their authorship was ascribed
to the god Hermes, being the Greek name for the God Thoth, the Ancient Egyptian
god of the Healing Art. It is thought that either Athotis (c. 3200 BC) or
Imhotep could have written these books.
Other Sources
Beside the medical papyri, our knowledge about the state of medicine in
Ancient Egypt is derived from:
Other papyri, writings, chronicles, documents, referring to medical
conditions and the practice of medicine. Such references prove the existence of
medical writings since the first and second dynasties.
Tomb paintings and writings.
Statues, especially those depicting pathological conditions.
Instruments, appliances, etc.
Human remains:
Mummies.
Skeletal remains.
The word mummy is derived from Latin 'mummia' which refers to bitumen, a
material dark in colour. 'Mummia' itself may be derived from the Arabic word for
mummy: Mümiya. It is of note that both Jacob and Joseph were mummified (Genesis
50, 2-3, 26). Mummification in Ancient Egypt passed through different stages:
Pre-dynastic (before 3200 BC) - mummification was by desiccation (Riad,
1965).
Early dynastic period - there were early attempts to preserve viscera.
Middle Kingdom (2100-1700 BC) - Visceral removal was more common.
New Kingdom (1555-712 BC) - mummification was more elaborate (Iskander,
1980; Pirsig and Parsche, 1991). However, in some mummies so much force had been
used that the skeleton was destroyed.
Graeco-Roman period (332 BC - 641 AD) - The art of mummification was in
decline. The Birmingham Mummy is an example of that period.
It is unlikely that mummification was practiced after the 4th century AD.
Both Herodotus (fifth century BC) and Diodorus Siculus (first century BC) wrote
about mummification when they visited Ancient Egypt. They described three
different types of mummification, which were practiced at the time they visited
Egypt, depending on the expenses incurred.
Most discovered mummies were frequently unwrapped, sometimes this was
carried out as a public performance. Pettigrew, in the first half of the 19th
century, gave courses (of six lectures) that concluded with the unwrapping of a
mummy. Such practices continued till recently.
Mummies were used for different "purposes", including being shoveled into
the fireboxes of locomotives. Nowadays, with modern techniques, it should be
possible to study mummies with non-invasive methods (Macleod et al, 2000), that
would allow the survival of the "few" remaining mummies for future generations.
Even badly preserved mummies can be treated to be more "preservable".
Bedside Diagnosis
Kindness and care were the maxims adopted by the ancient physicians when
approaching their patient. We read in Ebers (Case 40, 200): 'Go to him (i.e.,
the patient) and do not abandon him'. In Edwin Smith (Case 7) that of the
patient suffering from tetanus it ends 'Undertake him, do not desert him, in
view of the exhaustion'.
The consultation involved taking detailed history, asking the patient and
observing his reaction: 'If thou ask of him concerning his malady and he speak
not to thee…'. The general appearance of the patient and his nutritional state
are noted: '(a patient) whose body shrinks' (Ebers, Case 39, 197) or 'he turned
deathly pale' (Ebers, Case 39, 198). Also the physician noticed special signs as
facial palsy (Edwin Smith, Case 7), squint (Edwin Smith, Case 8), nystagmus
(Ebers, Case 99,855) and ptosis (Ebers, Case 62, 408).
The physician uses his nose as well e.g., a wound on the skull smells like
'the urine of sheep' (Edwin Smith, Case 7) breath of patient compared to 'a
latrine' (Ebers, Case 37, 190).
Feeling of the pulse was emphasized. Palpation of masses was meticulous and
recorded in detail e.g. fluctuation (Ebers, Case 107, 867), sebaceous cyst with
punctum (Ebers, Case 107, 869 and 870). A case of aneurysm is described thus
(Ebers, Case 108, 872): '... a swelling of vessels… and thou findest that it is
hemispherical (?) and grows under thy fingers on every going (i.e., pulsation of
the heart), but if it is separated from its body, it cannot on account of that
become big and not give out (i.e. diminish), then thou shalt say concerning it:
it is a swelling of a vessel.... It is vessels that case it, and it arises
through injury to a vessel'.
Cirsoidaneurysm or A-V fistula is described (Ebers, Case 108,873). '...if
thou examinest a swelling of vessels on the leather layers of any limbs and its
appearance is growing on account of serpentininig of the serpentry and they have
formed many knots ... it is swelling of vessels.... that jumps (i.e. pulsates)
in the midst of these limbs' (Ebell, Case 198, 1937).
The temperature of a part was noted (Ebers, Case 46,189), crepitations in
fractures felt (Edwin Smith, Cases 17, 24 and 44), pulsation of brain perceived
(Edwin Smith, Case 6). The physician also observes the reaction of the patient
on palpating the offending site (Edwin Smith, Case 20): 'if thou examinest a man
having a wound in his temple, penetrating to the bone (and) perforating his
temporal bone... if thou pullest thy fingers on the mouth of that would (and) he
shudder exceedingly'. Percussion was resorted to (Ebers, Case 36, 189 and 106,
864).
The physician also carries out some clinical tests as asking the patient to
look to both shoulders and to the chest to test neck movement (Edwin Smith, Case
30), inability to close the mouth was noted (Edwin Smith, Case 25). The
physician would resort to 'laboratory tests for fertility, pregnancy, and to
know the sex of an unborn child' (Riad, 1965).
Causation of 'disease'
Egyptians assumed that man was born healthy, and that every disease has a
cause. These causes can be visible or occult, internal or exernal:
Exogenous causes: overeating, drunkenness, air, worms and insects.
Endogenous causes: whdw originates from a putrid process in the intestines
and can circulate in the body; thus the practice of using purgatives. However,
the appearance of whdw is related to external factors as food and aaa, which
some authorities suggest as bilharziasis. Other such materials as the whdw were
st.t: mucous, n.wt: bile.
In their physiology, they believed in the presence of 'conduits' that carry
blood and humour, blockage of these conduits leads to flooding and droughts in
the body with resulting illnesses. Agents causing disease can enter through
natural openings in the body, and can similarly, leave the body. They also
believed in occult causes, spirits and demons. Psychological factors were
recognized as cause of 'dis-ease'.
Wounds
The edges of a clean cut wound were brought together either with adhesive
tape (Edwin Smith, Case 10 - eyebrow, and Case 27 - chin) or stitching (Edwin
Smith, Case 23 - ear, and Case 26 -upper lip). This is the first time in history
a mention of 'stitching' a wound was described. However, Ebell translated the
text as 'stapling', still the first ever to be mentioned. Other wounds were not
sutured, but kept open. Fresh meat was applied on the first day as an efficient
haemostatic and mechanical agent, as we use muscle grafts nowadays! In the
following days, the ancient surgeon used astringents, herbs and honey, the
latter being hygroscopic. They also applied sour or mouldy bread to wounds
(Ebers, Case 70, 522), the antibiotic of their time. Further, they applied a
special mud that has been shown to contain tetracyclines. They recognized
granulation tissue and that at times was encouraged and others discouraged (Case
71; Ebell, 1937).
Human bites were dealt with (Ebers, Case 64, 432-435) as their potential
dangers were recognized then as now. Though no specific anatomical area is
mentioned in the section on human bites, yet, it is very likely that some were
seen by the 'Head Doctors'. The author has seen three cases of human bites in
his 'modern' clinical practice: two to the ears (auricles) and one to the nose
(tip).
Materia Medica
Caution should be experienced when analyzing the Ancient Egyptian
pharmacopoeae as a large number of the drugs used then cannot today be
identified for certain. The names of those translated should not be taken
literally e.g. it is possible that fly's blood (Ebers, Case 104, 857 and 858) or
fly's dirt (Ebers, Case 92, 782) refer to plants, i.e. are nicknames for
vegetable drugs.
Drugs included mineral, vegetable and animal products. Some of these drugs
had active ingredients and thus are all useful, e.g. liver for night blindness
(Ebers, Case 57, 351). Honey was used extensively on wounds and as part of other
remedies. Honey as a wound dressing can be beneficial as it inhibits growth of
micro-organisms and is hygroscopic thus attracting an abundant secretion of
leucocytes and antibodies. Onion juice is known to have bactericidal effect.
Egyptian onion is known to have plenty of juice (onion on wounds in Ebers, Case
70, 519). Onion juice was used in the ear after being warmed. Also garlic juice
was used locally in cases of discharging ears.
Medicines were used generally or locally. Local application depended on the
site or organ treated and condition dealt with. Thus, in ear disease powders or
liquids were used, also remedies impregnated in lint or linen. Gargles were
given in conditions affecting the mouth.
Directions for the production and administration of prescriptions were
documented. Measurements were mentioned always in capacity even for dried
material, the ordinary measure of capacity was 4.785 litres, the standard
measurement was 1/320, about 15cc i.e. a tablespoon.
Incantations and spells were of common usage, but obviously it was meant,
at least in part, to deal with the psychology of the patient, especially if the
case was hopeless or unlikely to respond to known remedies. An example of a
foetid nose (ozaena) was given when first date-wine is recommended, but this is
followed by an incantation; the ancient way of our present day reassurance!
Inhalations were known as in prescription 46, Berlin Papyrus.
It is worth mentioning that the word 'chemistry' is derived from (KEMI),
the name by which the Ancient Egyptians called their country. It is also thought
that the word 'pharmacy' is derived either from 'pharmaki', an Ancient Egyptian
word meaning 'that procures security', or alternatively is a compound of Coptic
'phahri' (medicament) and Ancient Egyptian 'haki' (magic).
Linen
Flax used to be cultivated in Egypt from the very early times as fabrics
were found in Neolithic, Bardarian, Pre-dynastic and 1st Dynasty periods, and
there is still flax cultivation in Egypt till now. Egyptian linen was highly
prized in the Old World (Proverbs 7, 16). The linen produced varied in texture
from the finest silk-like gauze to a canvas-like coarseness, this is evident in
the specimens seen in different museums of the world that house any sizeable
Egyptian collection. In the British Museum in London is a complaint of one
embalmer against suppliers who supplied him with a different type of linen to
that which he had agreed upon. It is also known that there were different taxes
for the different types.
Those who have seen a mummy must have found a good example of the Egyptian
embalmers mastery in the art of applying and arranging bandages. The same skill
was still available for the benefit of patients who were wounded. Bandages were
used to cover and keep in place the medicaments described or as a mechanical
support for healing broken bones. One type of bandage was made by the embalmers
for the use of the surgeons (Edwin Smith, Case 9). Others were made by the
surgeon himself (Edwin Smith, Case 7).
Linen was also used in small pieces as swabs to clean (Edwin Smith, Cases,
11, 12 and 22) and at times impregnated with medicaments and used locally. Some
splints were made of linen. Adhesive plaster was also made of linen (Edwin
Smith, Case 10); these were used in pairs and made to bring the edges of a wound
together. Linen was also used to make nets to hold injured ears in place, also
strips made of linen were used if an injured ear proceeded to necrosis (Case 41,
Ebbell, 1937). Linseed was used medicinally either applied externally on
abscesses and local inflammatory conditions or internally as linseed tea for
cough.
Surgical Instruments
The following are some of the surgical instruments identified in texts and
exhibits:
Knives: Different types of knives were used for different purposes, some
were straight, some had curves or points. Khept - used in cases of otorrhoea
(Ebers, Case 91, 767) Shas and Das - for myiasis (Ebers, Case 108, 875). A reed
was used at times to make an incision (Ebers, Case 108, 876).
Forceps were straight or curved, some with toothed ends, some with a
sliding ring to secure a firm grip.
Cautery was used to treat aneurysms (Ebers, Case 108, 872). A heat drill
was used to make holes in abscesses of the mandible.
Thorn to pierce blisters (Ebers, Case 69, 504).
Swabs on sticks were used; linen was wound round ends of reeds (Fig.1),
possibly to clean clots.
A graphic representation of instruments (Fig.2) is seen on a wall engraving
in Kom Ombo Temple, built by Ptolemy V (2nd Century BC). A collection of
scalpels (Fig. 3) and forceps (Fig. 4) are present in the Egyptian Museum,
Cairo.
Anaesthesia
Sedative drugs like opium and hyoscyamus were known. Dioscorides (V, 158)
and Pliny (xxxvi, ch.2) relate that the round stone of Memphis (marble) was
applied with vinegar to the skin area as an anaesthetic. It is thought that the
carbonic acid formed anaesthetized the skin. In Ebers Case 782, opium is used to
remedy 'much crying'.
[see pic below]
Legal Aspects
There was a strict legal system in Ancient Egypt as evidenced by the
presence of legislative laws and of the different levels of courts. The most
famous legislative law in Ancient Egypt we know of in its complete origin is
that of Hor-m-heb (Pahor Labib and Sophy Abu-Taleb, 1972). However, in that law
there is nothing related to doctors or the practice of medicine. There were
other legislative laws in Ancient Egypt, but of these only fragments are
referred to in some inscriptions like that of the minister of justice, Rekhmire,
during the reign of Thutmose III, 18th Dynasty. The only known laws related to
medicine are those concerning the stealing of the mummies where there were many
law suits against robbers during the Ramesside period (1330 to 1085 BC).
Diodorus Siculus described how the physicians were judged: 'If whilst
following the rules laid down in the sacred book, they do not succeed in saving
their patients, they are held free from all guilt, if on the other hand, they do
anything contrary to those rules, they undergo capital punishment' (Oppenheimer,
1910). Only one example of such punishment is known.
Imhotep
From the foregoing, it is certain that the medical knowledge of the Ancient
Egyptians is worthy, of Ebbell's remark 'Since, then, Egypt and not Greece must
be considered the original home of the medical art, we ought not to set up the
Greek Aesculapius as the patron genius of medicine, but rather the physician
whom the Egyptians gave this dignity, viz Imhotep.'
OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
THE EARS
I. Anatomy
The Tympanic Membrane: It is generally believed that Hippocrates was the
first to mention the tympanic membrane. However, we find the mention of the
tympanic membrane in the Ancient Egyptian medical writings. "The ear that
contain inside the tympanic membrane would be deaf from the eye vessels," though
Ebbell's translation reads differently.
The Auricle: In a relief from Sakkara the ear shows the incisura that
nowadays is an important anatomical landmark when operating on ears through an
endaural incision.
The Eustachian Tube: It is generally believed that Aristotle was the first
to mention the eustachian tube, and this was in goats, but in Ebers Papyrus
(Case 100) we read: "There are four vessels to his two ears together with the
ear canal, namely two on his right side and two on his left side. The breath of
life enters into the right ear, and the breath of death enters into the left
ear, another section: it (i.e. the breath of life) enters into the right side,
and the breath of death enters into the left side" (Ebbell, 1937).
II. Physiology
The relation between hearing and speech was known, thus in Ebers Papyrus
(Case 99): "When he is deaf, his mouth cannot be opened (i.e. he cannot speak)"
(Ebbell, 1937).
III. Secretory Otitis Media
Flu was known in Ancient Egypt and Ebers Papyrus (Case 763) we read: "Flow
out, those who breakest bones, destroyest the skull, diggest in the bone marrow
and makest ill the seven holes in the head". Thus, here is describing flu with
sinusitis thus affecting the eyes and also affecting the ears as well with the
possibility of secretory otitis media. This description of secretory otitis
media antedates that of Hippocrates by more than a thousand years.
IV. Discharging Ear
This was recorded as a result of acute otitis media (Berlin Papyrus, Cases
201, 202, 203): chronic suppurative otitis media (Ebers Papyrus, Cases 765, 766,
767, 768, 769 and 770) or mastoid disease. In the Berlin Papyrus, a 6
prescriptions for the ear, 4 pharmacological: for "pressure in the ears" (Case
200 - is this possibly Menieres!) and for mucous discharge (Cases 201-203).
V. Ear Piercing
This was practiced in Ancient Egypt and in some mummies the holes are large
and drawn by the weight of the ring.
VI. Injury to the Ear
In the Edwin Smith Papyrus, Cases 22 and 23 were injuries involving the
ear. In Case 22 the injury is to the temporal bone and the ear is included, so
that in the course of his examination, the surgeon is charged to probe the ear
and seemingly to remove splinters of the bone (Breasted, 1930). Case 23 is the
only case in Edwin Smith Papyrus that deals exclusively with the ear, although a
number of described injuries to the head involved the ear. In this case the
surgeon sutures the wound "with stitching behind the hollow of his ear," the
skin on that side being more amiable for such procedures! Bandaging with linen
is practiced.
In the Ebers Papyrus is a description of management of a wound to the ear.
In this case a net is used to hold the ear in place and healing by primary
intention is encouraged.
NOSE
Mummification
In the process of mummification, the brain was evacuated from the skull.
The embalmers used to remove the brain through the roof of the nose and evacuate
it with fine instruments. In later dates, they used to remove a vertebra from
the back of the neck and evacuate the brain through the foramen magnum and then
replace the vertebrae back.
Nasal Catarrh
Ebers (Cases 192 and 762) deals with nasal catarrh possibly with sinusitis.
Ozaena was described in Ebers Papyrus (Case 761): "The beginning of remedies
against a fetid nose: date-wine, its (i.e., the nose) opening is filled
therewith".
Hypertrophied Turbinates
Hypertrophied turbinate bones were discovered by Ruffer in a skull of 1000
BC and in two skulls of the Greek period.
Foreign Bodies
In a mummy of a priest of Amon of the 21st Dynasty, a large vesical
calculus (6.5cms in diameter) was found in the nostril being placed by the
embalmer. It consisted of uricacid nucleus surrounded by phosphates (Rowling,
1967). Did the Ancient Egyptians believe that the vesical stones bring luck as
Trichobezoars (hair-ball in the stomach)!
Injuries
In Edwin Smith Papyrus we find the following cases of injuries to the nose:
Case 11: "Break in the column of his nose", meant the bridge, swelling and
blood discharge from nostrils. The linen mentioned in the treatment had
different names signifying the different types. The type used for cleaning and
packing is probably smaller and softer (also used in Case 12 and Case 22 to
clean inside the ear). The linen used for splinting is "stiff rolls, root-like
in shape (used in Case 12, also in Case 23 for supporting slit in the auricle of
the ear and Case 34 to support clavicle). In this case a depressed fracture was
present without lateral displacement and was set back and splintered. The idea
that this case is just a soft tissue injury as expressed by Breasted in his
introduction to Case 12 is born out by the literal translation of Breasted
himself.
Case 12: "Break in the chamber of his nose", meant fracture of nasal bones, and also findest his nose bent, which his face is disfigured, (and) the swelling which is over it is protruding" (Breasted, 1930).
Case 13: In this case is a fracture of the nose with crepitations and with bleeding from the ear on the same side. An ailment not to be treated. This must be a case of fracture base of skull.
Case 14: Piercing wound of nostril stitching being used (Breasted, 1930) and fresh meat was used as a dressing.
THE THROAT Tracheostomy
Two slabs were discovered dating to the beginning of the 1st Dynasty, one
in Abydos concerning King Aha and the other in Sakkara, concerning King Djer.
Each slab depicts a seated person directing a pointed instrument to the throat
or chest of another person who is kneeling backwards with his arms tied behind
his back. Petrie, Emery and Zaki Saaed believed that this denotes human
sacrifice whereas Vikentiesf and Hussain believe it to be a tracheostomy being
performed. The latter view is more appropriate as the lancet is used as a
determinative "to breath" rather than the habitual signs of the nose or the
sail. In Aha's slab the sign Ankh is present; the way the scalpel is handled is
more appropriately directed to the trachea than the neck vessels as obviously
the best way for slaughtering was known even at prehistoric times! The arms
placed behind the person to be operated on will be explained on similar grounds
to our present-day practice of placing a sandbag between the shoulder blades,
thus hyper-extending the neck, when patients are having tracheostomies, beside
they did not use general anaesthetic then!
Nasopharynx
Wells (1963) describes a skull dating from 3rd to 5thdynasty, with erosion
of alveolus of left maxillar and destruction of the same side of the hard
palate, pterygoid plates and posterior wall of maxillary sinus. The vault of the
skull shows multiple translucent areas. The likely diagnosis is plasmacytoma of
upper respiratory tract (nasopharynx) with bony deposits in the scalp indicating
a multiple myeloma change. The vault deposits are typical of the multiple
myeloma type.
Derry in 1909 described a case with destructive lesions involving the
cribriform plate, ethmoids and sphenoids. Elliot Smith thinks this case is a
malignant process arising in the nasal mucus membrane.
Oesophagus
The case described in Ebers (Case 206) can be cancer of the lower
oesophagus, though it is generally believed to be cancer of the stomach. The
symptom of dysphagia and the signs of dehydration are described.
Endocrine Glands
Thyroid Gland
Goitre was known to the Ancient Egyptians and was given a name. Two statues
of father and son (Fefi and Tesen) show signs of Grave's disease (Ghaliongui and
Dawakhly, 1965). Also a further statue, but for an anonymous person, was
excavated from the same tomb, shows signs of Grave's disease, expothalmous, lid
retraction and pre-tibial myoedema.
Pituitary Gland
Aldred and Sandison (1962) have discussed in detail the case of Pharaoh
Akhenaten and concluded from studying the monuments that he presented an
acromegaloid facies and an eunuchoid obesity. It is suggested that Akhenaten had
a pituitary adenoma that led first to acromegally but later on pressure
hypofunction of the pituitary gland developed. Ghalioungui (1963) suggested
Akhenaten's breast fullness may have been due to liver disease caused by
bilharziasis, a common disease in Egypt then and nowadays. Elliot Smith
considered Akhenaten had suffered from Fröhlich's syndrome.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLES
TABLE I: ANCIENT EGYPTIAN HISTORY
Pre-dynastic period Before 3200 BC Pre-dynastic
Old Kingdom 3200-2270 BC 1st-6th Dynasties
First Intermediate Period 2270-2100 BC 7th-10th Dynasties
Middle Kingdom 2100-1700 BC 11th-12th Dynasties
Second Intermediate Period 1700-1555 BC 13th-17th Dynasties
New Kingdom 1555-712 BC 18th-24th Dynasties
Late Dynastic Period 712-332 BC 25th-30th Dynasties
Graeco-Roman 332 BC-641 AD
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE II: MEDICAL HIERARCHY IN ANCIENT EGYPT
Ancient Egyptian Title Today's Equivalent
Physician Generalist
Chief Physician Specialist
Medical Inspector District Medical Officer
Director of Medicine Regional Medical Officer
Chief of Physicians Chief Medical Officer
Chief Physician of the Palace of Life Minister of Health
Ultimate responsibility to Vizier (Politician) Prime Minister
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE III: DOCTORS AND THEIR AIDS IN ANCIENT EGYPT
GENERAL SPECIALISTS AIDS
Physician for the Public Eye Nurses
Physician for the Palace Dentists Masseurs
Physician to Foreign Lands Enternist (Belly) Manicurists
Physician assigned to:
Army, Fleet, Miners, etc. Gynaecologists Bandagists
Head doctors Embalmers Surgeons
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE IV: THE PRINCIPAL MEDICAL PAPYRI
Name Period Location Condition Contents
Kahun 1900 BC London Frag. Women's diseases
Edwin-Smith 1600 BC New York Unfinished Surgical (48 cases)
Ebers 1550 BC Leipzig Complete Medical (108 cols)
Hearst 1550 BC Berkeley Incomplete Practioner's (18 cols) recipe book
Erman 1550 BC Berlin 9 cols Charms for childcare/infants
London 1350 BC London Fragmentary Recipe book (19 cols)
Berlin 1350 BC Berlin 21 cols Recipes
Chester-Beatty 1200 BC London Incomplete Oral diseases
Medical and Laboratory items
A) In Iran
Bastan Museum (National Museum of Iran), ceramic, glass and metal
cupping-glasses manufactured in workshops of Rey, Gorgan and Neishabour, during
9th and 10th centuries A.D., are exhibited. Those shape is similar to that of a drinking glass, with rounded bottom
and smooth rim, tapering into a tubular end. Horn-like shape of these medical instruments has caused it to be called
as such. B) Other
glass items on display include specimen preserved in Glassware and Ceramic
Museum of Iran (Abguineh): 1- Medicine container of thin glass, height: 13.5 cm., North-west of
Iran, 2nd-3rd century A.D., Arsacid period. 2- Medicine container of thin glass, height: 7.6 cm., North of Iran,
2nd-3rd century A.D., Arsacid period. 3- Cupping-glass, iridescent, rim diameter: 3.7 cm., Khorasan, 13-14th
century A.D. 4- Cupping-glass, iridescent, rim diameter: 5 cm., Khorasan, 13-14th
century A.D. 5- Glass laboratory container, iridescent, length: 19.5 cm., Neishabour,
10-11 century A.D. 6- Glass medicine mortar, diameter: 4.8 cm., Gorgan, 11th century
A.D. 7- Glass medicine mortar with square rim, length: 11.7 cm., Gorgan,
10-11th century A.D. 8- Glass laboratory container, iridescent, length: 18.5 cm., Neishabour,
13th century A.D. C)
Also
among lacquered preserved in Reza Abbasi Museum, A barber's toolbox from 19th
century, signed "Sadeqolvadeh" and decorated with flower and bird motives, could
be admired. Inside it, complete panoply of a barber could be seen. History and development of every nation's literature, knowledge and art
are truthfully and realistically reflected within the pages of its handwritten
books. Brief survey shows, that more than 1480 identified medical manuscripts,
ranging from 11th to 19th century A.D., are currently preserved in various
museums and cultural or scientific institutions in Iran and all over the world.
These include some 500 title of books, translations and independent works,
written by various physicians and reminder comprises duplicate copies. Surveying titles and contents of these books, one realizes that Iranian
Physicians have left us works in every medical field and dealt with all things
related with man's interior and exterior, generally or specifically covering
infectious and venereal diseases, gynecology and child-birth, embryology and
pregnancy, infantile illnesses and child growth, senility and gerontology,
ophthalmologic disorders, nervous and mental malfunctions, reproduction
maladies, hygiene and health preservation, particular ailments, dermatology and
hair care, digestion troubles, otorhinolaryngologic ailments, hair loss,
pharmacology, surgery, dissection, veterinary science, ... Besides writing specialized books, many physicians have also published
bi-lingual lexicons and scores of literary medical works, entitled "Teb Manzoum"
(Versified Medicine). Most of these manuscripts deal with general hygiene and preventive care,
ophthalmology, infectious and epidemic diseases, gynecology, anatomy and
physiology, internal diseases, surgery, pharmacology and drug making, botany and
zoology. It seems Iranian doctors were also very keen upon hygiene and preventive
care and considered it more important than treatment following sickness. In terms of
the number of extant copies, appears following books were of particular
importance, as well as the most read: More information on some medical manuscript, which are in Iran
Museums: 1- Zakhireh
Kharazmshahi
Joseph Lister is alongside the likes Louis Pasteur, Robert Koch, Alexander Fleming and Edward Jenner in the work he did to further medical knowledge. Joseph Lister did not discover a new drug but he did make the like between lack of cleanliness in hospitals and deaths after operations. For this reason, he is known as the ‘Father of Antiseptic Surgery’.
Lister was born in 1827 and died in 1912. As Professor of Surgery at Glasgow University, he was very aware that many people survived the trauma of an operation but died afterwards of what was known as ‘ward fever’. Work on ward cleanliness and the link between germs and good post-operative health had already been studied by a Hungarian doctor called Ignaz Semmelweiss. He argued that if a doctor went from one patient to another after doing surgery, that doctor would pass on to the next visited patient a potentially life threatening disease. He insisted that those doctors who worked for him wash their hands in calcium chloride after an operation and before visiting a new patient. Deaths on the wards Semmelweiss was in charge of fell from 12% to just 1%. But despite this, he came up against the conservatism of those who dominated Hungarian medicine and his findings were ignored. Semmelweiss died in 1865 of blood poisoning. In 1865, Lister read about the work done by Louis Pasteur on how wine was soured. Lister believed that it was microbes carried in the air that caused diseases to be spread in wards. People who had been operated on were especially vulnerable as their bodies were weak and their skin had been cut open so that germs could get into the body with more ease. Lister decided that the wound itself had to be thoroughly cleaned. He then covered the wound with a piece of lint covered in carbolic acid. He used this treatment on patients who had a compound fracture. This is where the broken bone had penetrated the skin thus leaving a wound that was open to germs. Death by gangrene was common after such an accident. Lister covered the wound made with lint soaked in carbolic acid. His success rate for survival was very high. Lister then developed his idea further by devising a machine that pumped out a fine mist of carbolic acid into the air around an operation. The number of patients operated on by Lister who died fell dramatically. Louis Pasteur was born in 1822 in Dole, France. Louis Pasteur’s name is forever cemented in the history of medicine. He, along with Alexander Fleming, Edward Jenner, Robert Koch and Joseph Lister, is of great importance when studying medical history. Pasteur’s discovery – that of germs – may seem reasonably tame by the standards of 2002, but his discovery was to transform medicine and see his name forever immortalised on a day-to-day basis in pasteurised milk – named in his honour.
Pasteur is important for three reasons:
As a young man, Pasteur studied at the Ecôle Normale in Paris. In 1843, he became a research chemist. He developed such a reputation, that in 1854, aged just 32, he became Dean of the Faculty of Science at the University of Lille. At this time, Lille was the centre of alcohol manufacture in France. IN 1856, Pasteur received a visit from a man called Bigo who worked at a factory that made alcohol from sugar beet. Bigo’s problem was that many of his vats of fermented beer were turning sour and, as a result, the beer had gone off and had to be thrown away. From a business point of view, this was a disaster. Bigo asked Pasteur to find out why this was happening. After using a microscope to analyse samples from the vats, Pasteur found thousands of tiny micro-organisms. He became convinced that they were responsible for the beer going sour. Pasteur believed that they caused the putrefaction of the beer – not that they were the result of the putrefaction. Pasteur continued his work on this theme by studying other liquids such as milk, wine and vinegar. In 1857, he was appointed Director of Scientific Studies at the Ecôle Normale in Paris. Between 1857 and 1859, Pasteur became convinced that the liquids he had studied were being contaminated with microbes that floated in the air. The medical establishment ridiculed him: "I am afraid that the experiments you quote, M. Pasteur, will turn against you. The world into which you wish to take us is really too fantastic." (La Presse, 1860) Pasteur was vilified in public but rather than give up, he determined to fight for what he believed in. Pasteur started to devise tests to prove that he was right. He was able to prove that:
In April 1864, Pasteur explained his beliefs in front of a gathering of famous scientists at the University of Paris. He proved his case beyond doubt – even if some of those present refused to believe him including Dr. Charlton Bastian who maintained his belief that putrefaction came from within and not from invading micro-organisms. Up to 1865, Pasteur’s work only involved beer, wine and milk. In 1865, he was asked to investigate his first disease called pébrine that affected the silk worm industry. Within a year, Pasteur had established that the disease was caused by a living organism and he now became convinced that microbes could also affect humans as well as beer and silk worms. In this sense, Pasteur believed that microbes could spread diseases among humans. Three of Pasteur’s daughters had died between 1859 and 1865; two from typhoid and one from a brain tumour. In 1865, a cholera epidemic hit Marseilles. Pasteur carried out a number of experiments in a hospital in the hope of finding the germ that caused this feared disease. He was not successful. In 1868, Pasteur suffered from a brain haemorrhage that affected the left side of his body. This affected his ability to work but the work that he had done up to 1868, had inspired a number of younger scientists. Pasteur developed his work by finding out ways humans could be prevented from getting a disease. He was inspired by his own desire to develop his knowledge but also by patriotism. Robert Koch was getting a great deal of attention throughout Europe for his discoveries and the French versus German rivalry that occurred provided a great spur to medical advances. In 1881, Pasteur met Koch at a meeting in London when the German was giving a lecture on what he had discovered up to that date. All Pasteur said to Koch after the lecture was "That is great progress". Koch had gathered around him a team of skilled research scientists. Pasteur frequently worked by himself. He realised that this was not the way to proceed and he also gathered around him a team of research scientists. Pasteur had always lacked detailed medical knowledge. Because of this he introduced into his team two brilliant young doctors, Emile Roux and Charles Chamberland. The first disease this team worked on was chicken cholera – a disease that affected many poultry farmers. Pasteur knew about the work done by Edward Jenner regarding smallpox. Pasteur reasoned that if a vaccine could be found for smallpox, then a vaccine could be found for all diseases. Pasteur did not know how Jenner’s vaccination worked so he had to proceed searching for a chicken cholera vaccine using a process of trial and error. In the summer of 1880, he found a vaccine by chance. Chamberland had inoculated some chickens with chicken cholera germs from an old culture that had been around for some time. The chickens did not die. Pasteur asked Chamberland to repeat what he had done but with a fresh culture of chicken cholera germs. Pasteur reasoned that a new culture would provide more potent germs. Two groups of chickens were inoculated; one that had been given the old culture and one group that had not. Those chickens that had been given the old culture survived, those that had not died. The chickens that had been inoculated with the old culture had become immune to chicken cholera. Pasteur believed that their bodies had used the weaker strain of germ to form a defence against the more powerful germs in the fresher culture. In April 1881, Pasteur announced that his team had found a way to weaken anthrax germs and so could produce a vaccine against it. Despite his fame, there were still those in the medical world who mocked Pasteur.
Rossignol was the editor of "The Veterinary Press" and in 1882 he challenged Pasteur to a public test of his anthrax vaccine. The tests were held in May 1882. Sixty sheep used in the test. Pasteur kept ten as they were and divided the other fifty into two groups of twenty-five. One group was inoculated with his vaccine while twenty-five were not. All fifty were then injected with the anthrax virus. Those that were not inoculated died within two days. The inoculated group suffered no ill-effects and were described as being "sound, and (they) frolicked and gave signs of perfect health". They proved that Pasteur was not exaggerating the powers of his vaccine. "The Times" in Great Britain called Pasteur "one of the scientific glories of France". Pasteur and his team turned next to the disease of rabies. Most human victims of rabies died a painful death and the disease appeared to be getting more and more common in France. Though the team could not identify the germ, they did find that the rabies germ attacked the nervous system only after it had made its way to the brain. The team traced the germ to the brain and spinal cord of infected animals and by using dried spinal cords, they produced a vaccine for rabies. The vaccine was first tried out on animals. Pasteur injected ‘clean’ animals with the rabies germ found in spinal cord that was fourteen days old. At this age, the germ was relatively weak and unlikely to threaten the life of the animals. He then used spinal cords that were thirteen days old, twelve days etc. on the animals until they were injected with the most virulent germ found in infected spinal cord that was fresh. All survived this. But Pasteur faced a serious problem. What worked on animals might not work on humans. In 1885, a young boy, Joseph Meister, had been bitten by a rabid dog, and was brought to Pasteur. The boy almost certainly would have died an agonising death if nothing was done so Pasteur took the risk on using his untested vaccine.
The boy survived and Pasteur knew that he had found a vaccine for rabies. Three months later, when he examined Meister again, Pasteur reported that the boy was in good health. Ironically, though Pasteur and his team knew that the vaccine worked, no one then in the world of science knew how it worked! Post-1945, many advances were made in the management of pregnancy and childbirth. This included the ability to induce labour and the use of epidurals to ease difficult pregnancies. As a balance to this, there was a move for less state intervention in childbirth and the development of the right for women to have more natural childbirth. In 1956, the National Childbirth Trust was set up. The chance of infant survival also improved as medical knowledge developed – as was seen in the work done to increase the survival rate of ‘blue’ babies. The greater use of scans after 1945 also helped to detect problems earlier. More vaccines were developed to control childhood diseases. After the war the health of children was generally better than at any other time in history. Vaccines against polio, measles and rubella were developed in the 1950’s and 1960’s. Tests were also developed for defects in babies such as the amniocentesis for spina bifida and Down’s Syndrome. Treatments were also developed for children with heart disease. After 1945, major advances were also made in birth control. In earlier times there had been advances in rubber sheaths but they were seen more as a protection against syphilis as opposed to a form of birth control. The cap or diaphragm had been developed in the 1880’s but its availability had been very much limited as people were kept in the dark as to its very existence. Marie Stopes did much to change attitudes as to give women more freedom when concerning birth control. However, pre-war social conventions had done much to prevent the total spread of her ideas throughout Britain. Many social conventions had been swept away during the war and by the 1950’s the contraceptive pill had been introduced as was seen as a way of giving women more control over their own destiny – and certainly taking this away from domineering men. By the 1960’s, the contraceptive pill was widely available, as was the IUD (Intrauterine device). This had first been developed in 1909 but was more widely available after 1945. Certain types of IUD were also linked to pelvic infection and septic abortions as late as the 1970’s and 1980’s. Such concerns did much to stymie its use. Many very significant medical advances were also made after 1945. One of the most important was the discovery of DNA by Wilkins, Crick and Watson. These three were also helped by the work done by Rosalind Franklin. DNA is the substance that makes life – a human cell that contains genes, which are made up of chromosomes, the basis of living tissue. This has in turn allowed the study of disease caused by defective genes such as in cystic fibrosis and Down’s Syndrome. In recent years, researchers have been able to identify specific genes that are responsible for specific diseases. New drugs have also been created post-1945. The success of penicillin during the war, prodded researchers to study other moulds. Streptomycin, found in chickens, was used successfully to treat TB. This treatment was pioneered primarily in America after 1946. Streptomycin was also found to be capable of treating many other diseases that penicillin could not. However, it was found that too much use of streptomycin could lead to the TB germ developing a resistance to its use. After 1951, streptomycin was used with Isoniazid in the fight against TB. This again was developed in America. By the 1970’s, five antibiotics existed which could be used against TB. In recent years, despite this array of drugs against TB, there have been fears that TB can be resistant to all drugs that have been developed to fight it. The recent rise of TB in the more depressed areas of Britain’s cities has concerned many doctors. The problems with streptomycin did lead scientists to study why drugs lost their effectiveness and also why some people suffered side effects when they were used and others did not. The development in pharmacology has been a major development since 1945. Since 1945, there has been a greater use of steroids in medicine. These were used to relieve pain and inflammation. Cortisone was used in injection form to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Cortisone also had the important side effect of reducing the body’s immune system. This made it useful to prevent the rejection of skin and kidney transplants. This in turn lead to the idea of using drugs to suppress the growth of cancers using cytotoxins. The use of ultrasound and magnetic resonance since 1945 has also made it easier to diagnose disease. Ian Donald, Professor of Midwifery at Glasgow developed ultrasound in the 1950’s for looking at unborn babies. Magnetic Resonance Imaging can be used to detect diseases without the use of radiation making it less harmful to the patient. Three-dimensional CAT scans can also be used. The less use of radiation the better as some patients can be harmed by exposure to large doses of radiation. MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) does away with this problem. The use of modern equipment such as the endoscope has also allowed for the internal examination of patients without the need for surgery. Kidney dialysis was first tried in 1914 but only became more widely available in the 1960’s. The introduction of long term and repeated dialysis gave hope to patients who almost certainly would have died without this particular development. Surgery in general has witnessed major developments since 1945. Far more operations can be carried out now on areas of the body that were rarely touched before 1945. Christian Barnard’s heart transplant was on an organ that few surgeons would have operated on. His pioneering surgery inspired others to do likewise and now heart operations are very common, as is surgery on organs such as the liver and kidneys etc. Microsurgery and keyhole surgery are common place now – as is the use of lasers in surgery. The major – though not exclusive – developments in surgery are as follows: Post 1953: the development of a successful heart lung machine allowed more complicated heart surgery to take place. Techniques have improved greatly here with coronary bypasses to improve blood supply to the heart since 1953 and the replacement of heart valves since the 1960’s. Artificial arteries have also been developed to improve blood flow. After 1961, pacemakers were introduced to maintain a regular heart beat. From 1960 on, lasers were used to treat eye tumours etc. Transplant surgery has also developed aided by drugs like cortisone, azathioprine and cyclosporin which have helped to reduce rejection. The first successful kidney transplant was done in Boston in 1954; the first heart transplant was in 1967 (performed by Christian Barnard); the first liver transplant was in 1963; the first heart and lung transplant was in 1982 and the first brain tissue transplant was in 1987. Since 1945, there have been major developments in replacement surgery. Hip replacement was pioneered by John Charnley, orthopaedic surgeon at Manchester Royal Infirmary. Since then, there have been knees and elbows have been replaced. In the area of reproduction, the development of IVF by Patrick Steptoe, led to the first test tube baby – Louise Brown – born in 1978. Steptoe’s work has given much hope to those couples who want children but have had difficulties producing them. However, the issue of IVF brought with it many ethical issues which cause controversy to this day. Since 1945, there have been massive strides in the treatment of cancer. The use of a combination of drugs, radiotherapy and surgery have greatly increased a cancer patient’s chances of survival. During the 1950’s, research linked smoking to lung cancer and other external factors have also been identified – such as excess sunlight potentially causing skin cancer. It is now thought that 15% of all cancers are caused by viruses. The major disease that has tested the medical world since the 1980’s has been HIV/AIDS. In the 1980’s, government’s touted HIV as near enough a death sentence and in Britain issued public health warnings on television showing icebergs crashing into the sea. Now, just twenty years on, combination drug therapy offers sufferers hope and a huge amount of research has gone into finding a cure or vaccination for this world-wide disease. ‘New’ diseases have also come to the fore including the Ebola virus. There is a vast difference in the medical world of 1945 to that of 2002. Developments within medicine would have been expected but they have been in leaps in the last decades. Diseases that would have almost certainly killed in 1945 to 1950 are now usually treatable and in many instances curable.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()